From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioboz-0004Mw-C7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 18:30:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioboy-0003K5-71 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 18:30:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iobox-0003Il-3s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 18:30:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iobow-0005Md-U0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 18:30:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38846] [PATCH 4/4] DRAFT doc: Add a cooption policy for commit access. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20200101163446.5132-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20200101163446.5132-4-ludo@gnu.org> In-reply-to: <20200101163446.5132-4-ludo@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:29:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87a770dv07.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-maintainers@gnu.org, 38846@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludo', Thank you for this series. Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > +@item > +Send @email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org} a signed message stating=20 > your > +intent, listing the three committers who support your=20 > application, and > +giving the fingerprint of the OpenPGP key you will use to sign=20 > commits > +(see below). > + > +@item > +Once you've been given access, please send a message to ^^^^ Probably just me, but this glosses over maintainer approval just a=20 bit too deftly, and that even with 3 signed referrals commit=20 access isn't guaranteed, just extremely likely. Unless that will actually change, I think we should briefly=20 mention it as well. People react worse to =E2=80=98let's try again later= =E2=80=99=20 when they think they've already passed. Understandably so. > +@email{guix-devel@@gnu.org} to say so, again signed with the=20 > OpenPGP key > +you will use to sign commits. That way, everyone can notice=20 > and ensure > +you control that OpenPGP key. Best to add an explicit =E2=80=98before pushing your first commit=E2=80=99 = here,=20 if that is the intent. > +When you get commit access, please make sure to follow ^^^^ =E2=80=98If=E2=80=99? Same point as the first @items above. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl4TwsgACgkQ2Imw8BjF STwFkhAAs11P+3coXRXkGGXzqaoGaZD3G2z8Dl67T82+/oDbHf7XZLJkoR7bHoHw 1blv0Q4zeKzy0NjLVfjXdHianaHdwrG0cTZMEHZhdxsponFxmRraqeqOCP8psITD BKq5EmNWvh+nCPtqxa2BK72J/PU7bD1F/Zq/WDurPEUdAdPxLuV54Sw6Qd8y28A8 PX2WPsMIsCs70l3naR27qvxBxol59xbRkbM72eSBAEXsB4J0r30qKwyHPd/05i1x 5iUcsO2lxfPXzb3rSLc6BRI/y227xCXrsfUkLNmtekpw/eZ9piPXU3l7b2PTTBdQ i/t94P4n6tIbvjh3RxqH4HFr2uQlS/PbxVxVeZGpA72HzC/+9bJ6XNza/jsZB8Nu ft9N4srCcFuBDcpVgyanNbnS83lqI9l79q3L81fkMEeLDoEzOOuhu3lS3nai3JfV e7G4jWotfrK9n6ejR8GlALyuVEdWeNefzvlrnBXhd1jv55habr4XZoNnuHh+8P3G bmW7Y0/3btjaAhi9k5TAgmteI0CYJvBvdKuaKCQQELuM/IyIXhCcMyGpdNMGyUKL bKcgEqqZ9NYM0jEXwpAA8qmwGFz+o8pVlDmvhtoYI1gult7N3hU2mVMqJooANOeS kct7UqGGk1pH9U/fWiryR/JAqbJS9mrdwQ74A7ASYtNLB4b6SSQ= =3/e/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--