From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwMD9-0000oB-Mo for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:27:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwMD8-0002uk-Hw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:27:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53499) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwMD8-0002uD-EZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:27:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwMD8-0006td-E8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:27:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39321] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-unkillable-scratch. Resent-Message-ID: From: Amin Bandali References: <20200127235121.14924-1-mab@gnu.org> <87lfpsm2zg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:26:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87lfpsm2zg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Message-ID: <87a768htql.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: 39321@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Nicolas Goaziou writes: [...] > > Is there any reason to use this particular commit? If so, please add > a comment in the definition. Otherwise, I suggest to stick to stable > releases. > The main reason is the introduction of a handy defcustom in [0], and less importantly other small typo/doc fixes, and lack of a tagged release in about a year. [0]: https://github.com/EricCrosson/unkillable-scratch/commit/26102d5434e47= c77219fce76c255cafb69b8e222 I think it would be nice if our package included the customization, but if there=E2=80=99s a strong preference over using a tagged release includin= g in this case, I=E2=80=99d be happy to send a v2 definition to use a tagged ver= sion, and later inherit from it in my personal channel to make a -git version including the feature for my own use. What do you think? > > Regards, Thanks, amin --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEObM8jZRIDS3cwqSYi0Sgzce5VvIFAl4v8DIACgkQi0Sgzce5 VvIr/A/7BWlg6rNi1rd44q63OC4+WUycriSt6BXzlvyAZseU5L1U4rHpiPJRVtOX 0az/a/Qc3MMaVxpnWCeR8Z50lM1bNqfDU1gpNGtYMruKvwGJYnJtz+oRA6o173J5 5p8O91Q6llWW+WtdthmiSVQdHwUf4UnPHATpYYTzOYxgzImic7PLRDS055/bTfI6 A7ujxtuZSpliNzmUKL+MBIa54szytXRpV1YI5zkYAHkv9A0M/r38LBE0Zu+oxujs xwO2ImT9Nq9NzVeRt8trWJ56W6oG9FEj9+I9xiRdJKjaYjVS2HLIJb1SjfRFvhQ2 oOtgag8KXcXVw/tm1pqY8auWsNXOuJeEfANjvfe+nBpfrtgmCSVcSPMD709bfKN8 XEOAb0HMbYpHDCNOVbY23MpdqJPssg1OlWc3LcT1Mv72dNpO6tfD7Sl60ADKjwq0 ak/NOkYcLWzJo3+KdpZciOC4w2EZuyFA0Cpr0RSXkSej16Zsrszo8XDYpZOADLTB ecYlRa3/Tz900hhy31SNI2WCh0lor/2MaNX+FWcOsXXnjOeJxzfj4fNrIr2nEJEE JbM6I1kddPTwoPPrVzgfX3O4qWInktXhxi43TWrj31p0E7OVizHqlAtlIac7c8ku JA7/txNlUwWXfIrt74wV15r1bN+JydA329v4XNNmorxCIyn6Vgw= =gWMe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--