From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40298)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gU6CU-0006Fk-PX
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 03:37:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gU6CU-0008P5-1H
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 03:37:02 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55516)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gU6CT-0008Oz-TD
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 03:37:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gU6CT-0004Dk-Pc
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 03:37:01 -0500
Subject: [bug#33540] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add lttoolbox, apertium
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33540.B33540.154391260716200@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20181203165024.25334-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:36:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20181203165024.25334-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> (Arun Isaac's
	message of "Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:20:20 +0530")
Message-ID: <878t158z8s.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Cc: 33540@debbugs.gnu.org

Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> skribis:

> I am using the release tarballs for both lttoolbox and apertium, since th=
ey
> are the asset tarballs and not autogenerated ones. Also, it turns out tha=
t the
> hash change of the lttoolbox tarball was due to a configure script being
> added. Therefore the patch-autogen phase is no longer necessary.
>
> Like you mentioned, apertium does have a submodule for apertium-get. But,=
 we
> cannot use it because we are using the release tarball.
>
> The other suggested changes are not a problem. I have made them. The upda=
ted
> patches follow. If there's nothing else, I'll push to master in 24 hours.

Alright!

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.