From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35342)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hfnZI-0006d0-Nv
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:41:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hfnZ8-0002nn-69
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:41:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47975)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hfnZ7-0002lT-Ov
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:41:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hfnZ7-0006qq-L6
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:41:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#36131] Add Multiple Common Lisp Packages
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36131.B36131.156147721226245@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <87pnnpey6c.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:39:57 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87pnnpey6c.fsf@gmail.com> (Katherine Cox-Buday's message of
 "Fri, 07 Jun 2019 19:08:27 -0500")
Message-ID: <878stpllma.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com>
Cc: 36131@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello Katherine,

Thanks for this patch series!

I=E2=80=99ve applied all of them until #7 included (fare-utils), fixing min=
or
issues that =E2=80=98guix lint=E2=80=99 reported.

I=E2=80=99d be grateful if someone reading this could do their share of
review/apply work!  :-)

I noticed that =E2=80=98ecl-hu.dwim.asdf=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98ecl-rt=E2=80=
=99 fail to build, so I
couldn=E2=80=99t test all the =E2=80=98ecl-*=E2=80=99 variants.  Could you =
take a look at these
two packages?

More generally, does it make sense to have ECL variants for each and
every package?  Or should we trim that down?  I=E2=80=99m under the impress=
ion
that ECL is typically used with rather small code bases since it=E2=80=99s =
meant
to be embedded, but then I=E2=80=99m not a Common Lisper.

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.