From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45418)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hhZpH-0008Jq-CC
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:25:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hhZpG-0005uK-Hn
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:25:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60187)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hhZpG-0005u2-EG
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:25:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hhZpG-0002qJ-8K
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:25:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#36162] [PATCH 0/4] Add 'remote-eval'
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36162.B.156190105710864@debbugs.gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45284)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>) id 1hhZoO-00088x-Lh
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:24:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>) id 1hhZoN-0004vS-Rq
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:24:08 -0400
Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:35474)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>)
 id 1hhZoN-0004ud-Nf
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:24:07 -0400
References: <20190610210853.5709-1-ludo@gnu.org>
 <87ef40c9f7.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87zhmmvrwg.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87zhmmbzxs.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <8736kd4u9a.fsf@gnu.org>
 <874l4thbea.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87sgsdfoj0.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <87tvcsjtw9.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
In-reply-to: <87tvcsjtw9.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 09:24:05 -0400
Message-ID: <878stjkxze.fsf@dustycloud.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 36162@debbugs.gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:

> I=E2=80=99ll push the =E2=80=98remote-eval=E2=80=99 things shortly.  Ther=
e=E2=80=99s certainly a few
> things we can improve, and one of them is progress report: there=E2=80=99s
> currently no call to =E2=80=98show-what-to-build=E2=80=99, and that=E2=80=
=99s obviously not
> great.

Hi Ludo'!

It looks like Jakob's code is nearing the point where we can merge it
into Guix proper.  I'd like to get in the "guix deploy" stuff as soon as
it's good enough to merge.  Would you mind pushing up your remote-eval
stuff, if you're confident enough to do so, since it's a preliminary
requirement for "guix deploy"?