Hi Danny! Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hmm, glib for example moves the binaries to a "bin" output while retaining the > libraries in "out". > > Any reason this patch moves the libraries and not the binaries? Ludo suggested this way I think out of consistency with the rest. > Also, I would have thought that those llvm programs reference the llvm > libraries anyway, and thus in the end no space could be saved. Is this > not the case? This patch not about saving space for LLVM programs, but packages that depend on LLVM libraries and which don't need the programs. Cheers! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/