From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id sNhnFM29qGWLZwEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:57:33 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id sNhnFM29qGWLZwEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:57:33 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bayesians.ca header.s=protonmail2 header.b=jSZ5RLGp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705557453; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=6Mso7hWUZlzp/jCttS2+ZIQZWvVuBo4oT859ntmvip0=; b=dfQj+RHwlgf7gOaiV9zWpifCmJNqd3GiZcgjlMnuo/yF1XvHJq45EKIJk6WlkOs2Qcohel e/gGjrMTHMB240Kw7cedvMLB/ObCAutnfO38Nq1DT1TA4ctr7QtKvLmHb76++U4uvqRXC1 bYd6gkLQrfZ+io5IvBK8926sePr6qWXpNaRi+ILyXLOfeW/A0991EcuBoaUihAjGf7US1t KfDsbDn3AOfffYTP33MXBXwJBhQRiaEov5ONd5LcREvGK1op02ksgy23kQ8cX2gyTGVWks QoA3ojVI4CAVNo1NORsgkbu0yB2Io6RlKPl0bJl1b//9zTkRdjl4C82fjY2Wqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bayesians.ca header.s=protonmail2 header.b=jSZ5RLGp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705557453; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=O+yKfJCgCDseR1/1BxKxBm+5AykhW95lQ6VttyeG6nRGnBmTTVcy5QfsBW21t1Y/diib1A 0QQSQZkgQtkJwxsMaHkBAtJed6R+DUeZ9NR+r0buhumA3gNML7odDHzUvPErz9KECvu8xt c9FHuYPm1TgsWtMvH6KrDNNJlEwDXcvnTUPztTgQAp2vKnZT2J4ZDf262mBUJUJhn/yCxz nWnS4MTbdQaemWJBhidg1HfyDZ4gAI2xQt5cy/9V2gfBEFmG9CwPPoWVt8A/xMpl00HmLF gILXXd7wMagk2egtr0fXDNpRV1ucmNLn05Wpfr7rpW3dY+86VBIYOEmg0hPi8g== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 008C418DAF for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:57:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQLOj-0006Wy-Rh; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:57:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQLOg-0006Wj-4g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:57:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQLOe-0000Pq-Ju for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:57:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQLOf-0008P1-OK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:57:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#67260] [PATCH emacs-team 0/2] Think ahead when compiling References: In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Suhail Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 05:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67260 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 67260@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 67260-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67260.170555737532234 (code B ref 67260); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 05:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 67260) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2024 05:56:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQLNu-0008Np-Qz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:56:15 -0500 Received: from mail-4317.proton.ch ([185.70.43.17]:38185) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQLNq-0008NX-8I for 67260@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:56:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bayesians.ca; s=protonmail2; t=1705557361; x=1705816561; bh=6Mso7hWUZlzp/jCttS2+ZIQZWvVuBo4oT859ntmvip0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=jSZ5RLGposcsrSIg7BUXTzANGnoGzOLMeVOXpu4HZSr0LCUa+uWUVXgBzIS97YUOJ FeTcRwJ8QcJt+F+Cz0ObwO6YM9Ot3KES964cILaLJy2XRa39sFfI2e1eLop4rO6Ms3 iHuatWZu8jxcCh7BEF4l1xiQSi5AmYBeL+750FCcdyVX4KlJYF+TELoCYB/Syu7J05 CHqtB9lxRRjQ0DSHzGHi/pRgWPzu0kTPHJrdUc1Cyof9D4HBq3ee8GsTaUE9+QJNH4 pg7Wf9uij3heRxgPSSl0zO81i/ikWNl0ztlqraVSoV0mb0eh+mizEUEA4L7knUxwP/ DJhT9FTynpv7w== Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 05:55:53 +0000 Message-ID: <878r4ngp7e.fsf@> Feedback-ID: 38691229:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Suhail X-ACL-Warn: , Suhail via Guix-patches From: Suhail via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.99 X-Spam-Score: -4.99 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 008C418DAF X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: SX8ak1nRpKRM Reporting some observations for the benefit of the community. I managed to install the following sequence of patches on emacs-team commit 60c97924e9 : - v3 1/3 - v3 2/3 - v3 3/3 - v4 4/5 - v4 5/5 I was able to build emacs, emacs-org and a few additional packages using the options "--no-grafts --with-input=3Demacs-minimal=3Demacs". When building "emacs-org-contrib" the additional option "--without-tests=3Demacs-clojure-mode" was needed as well. Having done so, upon starting emacs via guix-shell, I noticed a few messages in *Async-native-compile-log* which noted that libraries such as rx.el.gz and cl-macs.el.gz were being compiled. I observed native-compiled versions of these show up in ~/.emacs.d/eln-cache. Now this seems similar to the behaviour I observe in a non-Guix host where Emacs 29.1 is installed via the OS. There too my ~/.emacs.d/eln-cache has a number of entries that I was a little surprised to see such as those corresponding to rx and cl-macs. One difference, however, is in the names and the relative locations of these natively-compiled files. Outside of the guix shell (i.e., using the OS's native Emacs package) the eln files are named like ~/.emacs.d/eln-cache/29.1-115521d4/cl-macs-7ae82f81-e626a10e.eln whereas within the Guix shell using Emacs built from the installed patches you get names like ~/.emacs.d/eln-cache/29.1-c187d49d/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.eln. Note the sub-directory within the 29.1-* directory present within guix-shell container, as well as the lack of hash fingerprint in the *.eln file itself. I do not know if these differences are to be expected, or whether or not they're material in any way. Thoughts? Can this patch series be installed into emacs-team as-is? If not, what are the current blockers, if any? On a somewhat related note, when is the next merge from emacs-team to master expected to be? --=20 Suhail This email is not an offer capable of acceptance, does not evidence an intention to enter into an agreement, has no operative effect until a definitive agreement is signed in writing by both parties, and that no party should act in reliance on the email or any representations of the sender until a definitive agreement is signed in writing by both parties.