From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41669) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dO8Kk-0003yF-9B for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:04:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dO8Kg-0002pj-2d for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:04:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dO8Kf-0002pV-W3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:04:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dO8Kf-0005HR-OB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:04:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27302] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add emacs-dired-hacks-utils. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20170610010532.27495-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <871sqkp0og.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:02:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871sqkp0og.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:38:39 +0300") Message-ID: <877f03rdsd.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Alex Kost Cc: 27302@debbugs.gnu.org Hi! Alex Kost skribis: > Hello, thanks for the patches and sorry for the delay! > > I see that this "dired-hacks" repository is split into multiple packages > on MELPA, and you follow this path, however I think it would be much > easier for us just to have a single "emacs-dired-hacks" package. > Otherwise, we'll have to pick single files for all these "dired-open", > "dired-avfs" and other packages, which is not convenient. > > What do you think? Are there any objections on making a single > "dired-hacks" package? I think Oleg=E2=80=99s lack of response might suggest that we should apply = the patch as-is. :-) WDYT, Alex? Having separate packages may be better than nothing at all. Ludo=E2=80=99.