From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56793)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hDGDp-0000gZ-24
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2019 18:25:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hDGDm-0002Mh-VN
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2019 18:25:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35280)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hDGDl-0002M4-W3
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2019 18:25:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hDGDl-0001aZ-Mz
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2019 18:25:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#35185] [PATCH] gnu: mu: Update to 1.2.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35185.B35185.15546758456042@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <878swl7bk1.fsf@gmx.com> <87wok5h3cb.fsf@nckx>
From: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@gmx.com>
In-reply-to: <87wok5h3cb.fsf@nckx>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 23:23:23 +0100
Message-ID: <877ec578v8.fsf@gmx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
Cc: 35185@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Tobias,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:

> Pierre,
>
> Upstream wrote:
>> Substantial (algorithmic) speed-up of message-threading
>
> \o/

Yes! Full disclaimer, I've been running a git snapshot of mu for the
past few months just so I could get this early :-).

>
> Pierre Langlois wrote:
>> I've noticed we've moved away from using Github's generated tarballs
>> and
>> using git-fetch instead. However, it looks like the tarball for mu
>> is
>> provided by the developer so we should be fine.
>>
>> Is that right?
>
> Yes.  These unreliable (auto)-=E2=80=98generated tarballs=E2=80=99 we're =
getting rid
> of have =E2=80=98/archive/=E2=80=99 in the URL.  Others are fine.
>
>> +                                  "download/" version "/mu-"=20
>> version
>> +                                  ".0.tar.xz"))
>
> I've added the =E2=80=98.0=E2=80=99 to VERSION instead, and will push thi=
s tomorrow
> after some testing.
>
> Thanks!

Yeah, I wasn't sure what to make of the extra ".0" since the tagged
release is only "1.2". I think adding it to VERSION has you've done it
better.

Thanks!
Pierre