From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0IcTHDB8qV/sQQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:28:16 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id kNHbFzB8qV9mXAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:28:16 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1D389401BE for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57670 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcAxh-0002Oc-Qc for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:28:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcAxW-0002Nq-DA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:28:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcAxW-0005QG-3Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:28:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcAxV-0008Qx-VV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#38408] [PATCH 0/3] (WIP) Semantic version aware recusive importer for crates Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38408 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: 38408@debbugs.gnu.org, Marius Bakke Received: via spool by 38408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38408.160494287632408 (code B ref 38408); Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:28:01 +0000 Received: (at 38408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2020 17:27:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35512 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcAxQ-0008Qd-4X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:27:56 -0500 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:21527) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcAxO-0008QQ-KO for 38408@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:27:55 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 302A324000A; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <87wnywg5hs.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 18:27:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Hartmut Goebel's message of "Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:15:40 +0100") Message-ID: <877dquh23x.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: Lc7tDxzVHeDW Hello, Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 07.11.20 um 23:35 schrieb Marius Bakke: >> I don't think Ludovic has exclusive review rights on this issue. That >> is, anyone is free to review and merge. >> >> If you need this feature, perhaps you could try it and report whether it >> works (or not) for you? > > This is a huge pile of comments and versions, patches by others, some > already applied patches, etc. This is very hard to follow, one has to > check 20 mails/article whether they contain a patch, same the path > (giving it a filename), etc. This is why I'm asking those who already > worked on this to finish the review. IIUC, the base set is there: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2020-04/msg01442.html then, two patches (the first and sixth) need to be replaced with the following ones: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2020-05/msg00408.html and https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2020-08/msg00432.html HTH, -- Nicolas Goaziou