* gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-google-roboto)[arguments]: Add phase to unpack to a directory and ignore macosx files. --- After commit e93ee2547ecec152f9a198ccc338c4329cc69a71 this pkg doesn't contain anything. The difference to the version before is that the upstream zip file doesn't contain a subfolder anymore, so this patch unpacks to one (and excludes macosx files while at it). Maybe the roboto-hinted.zip is better than unhinted? Idk. gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm index 717656d682..72e97d99ea 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm @@ -801,6 +801,15 @@ display all Unicode symbols.") (sha256 (base32 "0a57f957qy49kildqx2lp2paqk9i8kkayakmrzxh39hhhmqlrxkh")))) (build-system font-build-system) + (arguments + '(#:phases + (modify-phases %standard-phases + (replace 'unpack + (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys) + (invoke "unzip" (assoc-ref inputs "source") + "-x" "__MACOSX/*" + "-d" "roboto-unhinted") + #t))))) (home-page "https://github.com/google/roboto") (synopsis "The Roboto family of fonts") (description -- 2.29.2
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 356 bytes --] Now that commit ec4a9cadcb2b44f86917c3ebb17c903149e42883 has reverted this problem/bug, I'm not sure if the patch is relevant anymore. -- GNU Emacs is an old-school C program emulating a 1980s Symbolics Lisp Machine emulating an old-fashioned Motif-style Xt toolkit emulating a 1970s text terminal emulating a 1960s teletype. (Daniel Colascione) [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 511 bytes --]
Hello, Michael Rohleder <mike@rohleder.de> writes: > After commit e93ee2547ecec152f9a198ccc338c4329cc69a71 this pkg doesn't contain anything. > The difference to the version before is that the upstream zip file doesn't > contain a subfolder anymore, so this patch unpacks to one (and excludes macosx > files while at it). Oops. > Maybe the roboto-hinted.zip is better than unhinted? Idk. There is no roboto-hinted.zip in release v2.138, only roboto-unhinted.zip and roboto-android.zip. Maybe the latter would be a better fit? WDYT? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 593 bytes --] Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >> Maybe the roboto-hinted.zip is better than unhinted? Idk. > > There is no roboto-hinted.zip in release v2.138, only > roboto-unhinted.zip and roboto-android.zip. Maybe the latter would be > a better fit? > > WDYT? I don't know, but I guess the android.zip has the same unzipping problem (haven't looked). With the patch everything should be good, no? -- The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra, SIGPLAN Notices, Volume 17, Number 5 [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 511 bytes --]