From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id KFxpIW1ifmYINQEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 07:12:45 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id KFxpIW1ifmYINQEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:12:45 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=HXEmlQxu; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1719558765; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=NCQLZYKF2PFGX1L0L4l7q2VZwS58sUarkOcUxn9Tfuo=; b=ft6CDKtHRw62zOp8WoG1oSJBizuXDxx027N/a1CQW2qb/HZ1BeFUCrfjSQy1LN89Go57vN ZSNs/A+7n5CMhHBuIqtRDqe705Xibe31rjs/Ss26N9xIEUa3q0//woB4L5vJBQBAaGLPLo 33KP+ri5N82QaPf3PRAZwEJk67VccnRh2UfaFJRImbQqjJML9inhRUxD0xbABS2B3Yk7Vg Suv4ZzHMAhykyid1G5leOxidJZWW+X1gZaMQ8thoHq8R1GNTq4vqmUEppBOBlkjy9Bwfnu +A44UpEWcMTKmjA453YLxIAxBn/9BPWtoiiKwP1yT9hUS5FjEIdsORdPBXt7Ww== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1719558765; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=J24Dvn87At2doKj0dgJqn94jeF1+RG68jqjjc24W3Tkrf903iAq4S/z6Q8o1XaWxfcL6ap 0bK/0R4NMLKyepHzTvrNj58dUcQUdgz6NVeY5eFa4Jk5+YJtE94qADb1dc0k3ZgPrF21jQ Sd7+Nuiya1VhqpJhqtHBF0SIpbeDvT6xlxFVlgRFY/r6LU4Z6GjgXkBCzcVU9GZgsx7UVo MfkQH4K63ccjMco5y43oFcqLcpyj0Q/3+rh/G3D1N21l1s2qzZ8/PkVlKl5yYA3PMd5C2M GZSHrvKGhLoOQzRqoWuZgVgULwsHSfREYIFZ/2AhQp25+0oyqVV2O/+iSw+Veg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=HXEmlQxu; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5956111855 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:12:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sN5gM-00014t-8a; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 03:06:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sN5gJ-0000q2-Vo for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 03:06:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sN5gJ-0003EY-L0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 03:06:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sN5gH-0002b1-W9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 03:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#71592] [PATCH 0/3] gnu: emacs-org: Update to 9.7.4. Resent-From: Suhail Singh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 07:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71592 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Adam Porter Cc: 71592@debbugs.gnu.org, Suhail Singh Received: via spool by 71592-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71592.17195583159906 (code B ref 71592); Fri, 28 Jun 2024 07:06:01 +0000 Received: (at 71592) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2024 07:05:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51702 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sN5fX-0002Zi-0E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 03:05:15 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f65.google.com ([209.85.219.65]:40856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sN5fU-0002ZT-Eu for 71592@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 03:05:13 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f65.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6ad8265e889so399386d6.3 for <71592@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:05:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719558248; x=1720163048; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NCQLZYKF2PFGX1L0L4l7q2VZwS58sUarkOcUxn9Tfuo=; b=HXEmlQxuU113FujliFiFJ/kN/G/GoPTVdFaqcJMdCDRtsPxkXjvpGyniA2YshMFstd PvPsssOqxA+oGhW7HCt9W0qnTa5FM4q9C4SnlNsQNh/eOggi58v2BhbNnVXANdXjxpss lvwfkrRZx8VaWvM6WD37TX5RJiXPHhOR0TlNZZUE9aDtaZeP3q4H1QtTRj39K1wU2e1P PaUUStJ4m1mJ/8Rb+oG0PGxJuZG5es+yqXfMlLyFBLcOrNnrJ05TqsniNsoETNXQfVo2 EOZ1BudXq8bDkEbNCwtRRWk4NMsVp+2DKIsJInAkMM4eOJ3Kucz/dzorOPKxwIUx4nyr yIfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719558248; x=1720163048; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NCQLZYKF2PFGX1L0L4l7q2VZwS58sUarkOcUxn9Tfuo=; b=bbEUY0LZaqM5io6++Su2zwVY8z+Z6Wh+55IfhNZcPjnhteDSqrs7TooIAc4sJRWsWD Cu6d5OD1lVo4UxREuCSdLHWsyBsiq58e9VBDfhESVpY5Jw/8Vs+u20LtZPmyuZj1fDSS PYObGhMcWkw44i36JUe6afA0WCrDDaZxUaJnJiOxZTG+7jTRGlcHFcO1V3z7pzXZY692 WWsaMH8mmi7gq2yhyU4Y8tZaMrr6/2OXQsQYa/Sz/uLGfAIK1nxhBsGnKA5kKzpHqdxL 9tU+/0/SMaPGWdOgHritKzXpkZqO05w3tBJXi851Ay58mvLawlVMdd0mts/NciODHH+7 X9Jw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU5WcM2JEfDIgc0XI1C5ZsQ5DIcGsxxhAzok/gqzQ1V8MSeOU31bM2aOq9r9m/5cPUheh9TlW6YLuTRIvQgaFv3hxyX+/w= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzv0t15ugGlFVx3oRC/Yu+fRvFF8/65miK2LsrtfkZpRGaMttt7 5NGz/VpvmYXxMaa9nIIrGOPYv/eQn85gZq6rmIGe2HJbaOt9X6j7MEsBqNeg X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFf6LQ8jRhjAkldYfC1/A0QdBHFzC8SknDeY4gf2YtToxy5le3IyNNSJqhrpK4r6DYvGCk7zg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7a84:0:b0:6f9:7373:9421 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-700a906d1b1mr17207768a34.3.1719533062881; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gnus (static-198-54-132-177.cust.tzulo.com. [198.54.132.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 46e09a7af769-701f7adb4afsm134736a34.48.2024.06.27.17.04.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:04:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Suhail Singh In-Reply-To: (Adam Porter's message of "Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:40:49 -0500") References: <87frt4ns9m.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 20:04:21 -0400 Message-ID: <877cea7x16.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5956111855 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.27 X-Spam-Score: -5.27 X-TUID: j/TfGlbw5OQo Adam Porter writes: > IOW, for some projects, the lints and/or tests are always going to fail > on some combination of Emacs/Org versions, even though the project in > question may actually work on it. That's understandable. When I encounter such situations, I find it helpful to separate tests where "failure is intolerable" from others where "failure, while not ideal, is acceptable". You may find it helpful to make such a distinction as well. > That would be issue #207, and it appears to be one of those things > that changes across Org versions, making it hard or impossible to fix > in a way that comprehensively passes testing (especially since I've no > control over the versions of Emacs and Org used in Guix). It's also a > minor bug, essentially a cosmetic issue, which has made it a low > priority to work on with my limited time, which I'm sure you can > appreciate. It seems that #207 isn't one that will be fixed in the near future and that that's acceptable (for users of org-super-agenda). It's unclear whether the failure in test `org-super-agenda-test--auto-parent' also corresponds to the same bug, or a distinct issue. Regardless, if one or more of the failing tests are acceptable failures, it would help Guix packagers if upstream was updated to provide a command/invocation that does not fail when such category of tests don't succeed. It would obviate having to ignore such failing tests in Guix and reduce the maintenance burden of downstream packagers. -- Suhail