From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56323)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1e9C9b-0006cC-Ra
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:39:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1e9C9W-0001Hi-TU
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:39:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33733)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1e9C9W-0001HX-QH
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:39:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1e9C9W-0004bW-HH
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:39:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#28433] [WIP] Rust update
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28433.B28433.150937788717627@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20170912185023.7de883ff@scratchpost.org>
	<873767cnsu.fsf@elephly.net> <20171026101728.6493ef46@scratchpost.org>
	<20171028124258.22553eee@scratchpost.org>
	<20171028133157.4dc52bd9@scratchpost.org>
	<20171028135726.76e5a14e@scratchpost.org> <87d1575dsw.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20171030123501.66cebab2@scratchpost.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:38:02 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20171030123501.66cebab2@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's
	message of "Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:35:01 +0100")
Message-ID: <8760aw7ijp.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>, 28433@debbugs.gnu.org

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:

> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 20:26:39 +0200
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:
>
>> Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:
>>=20
>> > Do we support lib32 a la "gcc -m32" ? How can we provide a working gli=
bc for that? It seems that rustc bootstrap is trying to use that option.=20=
=20
>>=20
>> We don=E2=80=99t support multilib, so glibc provides only 64-bit headers=
 on
>> x86_64 (if you try -m32 there you=E2=80=99ll get an error about missing
>> <gnu/stubs-32.h> or something like that.)
>
> Yeah.
>
> What happens when I use an i686 host/target gcc and use "-m32" (rustbuild=
 does that)? Will it just ignore the option?

Yes, I think -m32 is a no-op in this case.

Ludo=E2=80=99.