From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtJlT-0002y0-TU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:09:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtJlF-0006SZ-0h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:09:15 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtJl8-0006QH-1x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:09:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gtJl7-00077a-RQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:09:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#34398] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-backports-shutil-which. Resent-Message-ID: From: Vagrant Cascadian In-Reply-To: <20190211105421.3b77ef6b@scratchpost.org> References: <87k1i9v5ka.fsf@ponder> <20190211105421.3b77ef6b@scratchpost.org> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:07:52 -0800 Message-ID: <875ztq3rnr.fsf@ponder> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 34398@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On 2019-02-11, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 22:28:37 -0800 > Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> + (synopsis >> + "Backport of shutil.which from Python 3.3") >> + (description >> + "Python-backports-shutil-which provides a backport of shutil.which from >> +Python 3.3") > > Why do we need this package? We have Python 3.7.0. > Doesn't that contain the same module already? I found it odd as well, but I couldn't figure out how to get the newer versions of python-trezor-agent to build without python-backports-shutil-which without patching python-trezor-agent. I didn't spend too much effort looking into patching it; I'll take a little deeper look. Thanks for all the reviews! live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCXGHyOQAKCRDcUY/If5cW qsAaAP40cjyGT/uWoXhrllb4v3zPdIJL/n15rvaq2ddYkRYpjgEAuIeHHIw4nnvN bD3aUuJpYwtpczVaybNp3AnPWXiSvwY= =6FAH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--