From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hyiPI-0003yE-JH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:01:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyiPH-0007MZ-Fh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:01:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46108) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyiPH-0007MO-Cu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:01:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyiPH-0007Qf-AA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:01:03 -0400 Subject: bug#37043: [PATCH] gnu: font-ibm-plex: Update to 2.0.0. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: References: <20190815225208.28859-1-alva@skogen.is> <87ftm18kw9.fsf@nckx> <62c463d8-fd5a-4693-b209-1d87f00ffe86@www.fastmail.com> <87d0h58bpe.fsf@nckx> <7bb9c3a4-2403-4e7d-bf37-376960f2aaa8@www.fastmail.com> In-reply-to: <7bb9c3a4-2403-4e7d-bf37-376960f2aaa8@www.fastmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:00:08 +0200 Message-ID: <875zmw98zb.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via To: guix-patches@gnu.org Cc: 37043-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alva, Alva =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> I wonder whether making=20 >> %license-file-regexp in (guix build gnu-build-system) would=20 >> have=20 >> any unintended consequences.=20 > > My brain added "case-insensitive"; I don't know if that's what=20 > you meant. :) Your brain is absolutely right; mine's still in holiday mode. :-) > Anyway, I checked the regexp, and `[Ll]icen[cs]e.*` already=20 > matches license.txt, > so I don't know where it goes wrong. Not sure what's going on then. > Yes, my output is different; it contains a number of files that=20 > have the > same names as yours, except prefixed with "._", which file(1)=20 > identifies as > AppleDouble encoded Macintosh files, and LICENSE.txt is missing. > These files come from the aforementioned __MACOSX directory in=20 > the 1.0.1 zip. > I'm using btrfs, FWIW. S'oh boy. My previous =E2=80=98good=E2=80=99 output was built on ext4. He= re's=20 what building 1.0.1 on btrfs (and 4 cores) gave me. Safe to say=20 this package isn't exactly deterministic there. $ guix describe Generation 28 Aug 16 2019 15:11:34 (current) =E2=80=A6 guix 4cc5e52 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 4cc5e5204b503afb4536a1e93e2fd7a9f57f12bf $ tree `guix build font-ibm-plex` /gnu/store/xzxyn6sij2j1sdp9a1p2lg4xwxifhl63-font-ibm-plex-1.0.1 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 share =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 fonts =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 opentype 3 directories, 0 files $ That's 3 very different possible outcomes so far. My emptiness is=20 reproducible on this machine, though. I've pushed your patch (without the note about it not working=20 since It's Complicated and there's no need to justify a bump=20 anyway) as 93b3ef1966f9860ae88b87263f8c7f6052565c3f. It's now=20 reproducible on all my file systems, but feel free to try more.=20 Thanks! Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXVcLSAAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eVL2AQCffj0ld/XyGV/wNqY38fy1WZsMZwAZvbde3g4t+BaBwgD/bQh2yPoaHOj4 x6KJpXwH1tZ5L9gaxyj0U5KRXcFGpA0= =tb5G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--