From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42571)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1idxOp-0006jX-AR
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 09:19:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1idxOo-0006Gw-6G
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 09:19:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44690)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1idxOo-0006Fy-1I
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 09:19:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1idxOn-0005Ut-Tp
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 09:19:01 -0500
Subject: bug#38460: [PATCH 1/1] lint: Add '--load-path' option.
Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38460.D38460.157581468221044.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20191202204759.28329-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
 <20191202210127.28466-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
 <87blsoc8yv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ17wZvvuvo9kD5Bb4ONPNq8DC8chAZ-cMD0E_91hT-wxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87pngzsq9w.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ2xpURk-qZEFnNQVVb4v0SDexWgiAXr0KrK-x+VuXhjgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 15:17:44 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ2xpURk-qZEFnNQVVb4v0SDexWgiAXr0KrK-x+VuXhjgA@mail.gmail.com>
 (zimoun's message of "Sun, 8 Dec 2019 12:15:48 +0100")
Message-ID: <875ziqrjef.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: 38460-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:

> On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 at 23:51, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> Well, technically speaking it=E2=80=99s not copy/pasted since the code y=
ou sent
>> uses =E2=80=98find=E2=80=99 to grab the option; plus, we=E2=80=99re talk=
ing about very few
>> lines, which is typically hard to factorize.
>
> I agree. Even if I do not have a better solution to propose, I just
> feel the current one is not optimal.
>
> Does the same gettext entries G_ are duplicated? Do translators
> translate 2 times (or more) the same string?

No, they=E2=80=99re deduplicated.

>> So I sympathize with the bad feeling of repetition, but I=E2=80=99m not =
quite
>> sure how this can be avoided in this case.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> Thank you for the explanations. I am not sure neither and need to fail
> by myself to be convinced. ;-)
> And currently, any hypothetical break should be reported by the test
> suite. Hope so.

I think so.

I=E2=80=99ve applied it now, thank you!

Ludo=E2=80=99.