From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJLl2-0008Oc-3f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:37:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJLl1-0000A0-1f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:37:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJLl0-00009M-J3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:37:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJLl0-0006Ju-Fx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:37:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40190] Linux-Libre 5.6 Resent-Message-ID: References: <87k13gqhrw.fsf@ponder> <87sgi0le3g.fsf@ponder> <87mu87btng.fsf@yucca> <87mu7xg34t.fsf@ponder> <87h7y5g30m.fsf@ponder> <874ku5fkoq.fsf@ponder> <87369ovbpu.fsf@devup.no> <87tv24mnbo.fsf@ponder> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant In-reply-to: <87tv24mnbo.fsf@ponder> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:35:51 +0200 Message-ID: <875zekfk3c.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 40190@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Mark H Weaver , Marius Bakke --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > On 2020-03-31, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Vagrant Cascadian writes: >> >>> On 2020-03-30, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>>> And the second patch, switching to 5.5... >>> >>> And a third, rougher, less well tested patch switching to 5.6... which >>> could obviously be squashed into the previous patches and maybe skip 5.5 >>> altogether. >> >> 5.5 is not an LTS kernel, so going straight to 5.6 sounds like the >> right thing to do. However... >> >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm.conf b/gnu/pack= ages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm.conf >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm.conf >>> rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm.conf >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm64.conf b/gnu/pa= ckages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm64.conf >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm64.conf >>> rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm64.conf >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-i686.conf b/gnu/pac= kages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-i686.conf >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-i686.conf >>> rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-i686.conf >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-x86_64.conf b/gnu/p= ackages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-x86_64.conf >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-x86_64.conf >>> rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-x86_64.conf >> >> This does not seem right. Surely there are _some_ configuration changes >> in 5.6? > > Hence the "rough" patch. > > I honestly don't feel solid on all the configuration changes that need > to happen, so haven't been particularly thorough on auditing those. > > Running through "make oldconfig" prompted me with many options about > things I didn't really have a good grasp of, so the 5.5 changes at > essentially just the 5.4*.conf copied to 5.5*.conf, and applying the > copying the resulting .config from building the kernel into git... > > I could do the same for 5.6 again blindly taking the new defaults... or > if someone could help with auditing the config updates, that would be > great! > > > FWIW, also boot-tested linux-libre-arm64-generic with 5.6 as well. > > > live well, > vagrant From=20a quick test I made, support for the Wireguard VPN or the exfat file system in 5.6 is not activated by default when using 'make oldconfig' or 'make olddefconfig'. I think it would be nice to set them to 'module'. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQQkUwKxurH4Z/3KlryPP4Yfgut6mgUCXoONhwAKCRCPP4Yfgut6 mvGtAP0XyL4Q+HVITYOUZ6Y+06Mxm94dQR4P/Y0hEKgQHdLEPgD/Wx5+k104bXaN A/65hq965uPbRL2f0gDoAhgxwJd/FAA= =Ujgv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--