Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > On 2020-03-31, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Vagrant Cascadian writes: >> >>> On 2020-03-30, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>>> And the second patch, switching to 5.5... >>> >>> And a third, rougher, less well tested patch switching to 5.6... which >>> could obviously be squashed into the previous patches and maybe skip 5.5 >>> altogether. >> >> 5.5 is not an LTS kernel, so going straight to 5.6 sounds like the >> right thing to do. However... >> >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm.conf b/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm.conf >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm.conf >>> rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm.conf >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm64.conf b/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm64.conf >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm64.conf >>> rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm64.conf >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-i686.conf b/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-i686.conf >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-i686.conf >>> rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-i686.conf >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-x86_64.conf b/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-x86_64.conf >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-x86_64.conf >>> rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-x86_64.conf >> >> This does not seem right. Surely there are _some_ configuration changes >> in 5.6? > > Hence the "rough" patch. > > I honestly don't feel solid on all the configuration changes that need > to happen, so haven't been particularly thorough on auditing those. > > Running through "make oldconfig" prompted me with many options about > things I didn't really have a good grasp of, so the 5.5 changes at > essentially just the 5.4*.conf copied to 5.5*.conf, and applying the > copying the resulting .config from building the kernel into git... > > I could do the same for 5.6 again blindly taking the new defaults... or > if someone could help with auditing the config updates, that would be > great! > > > FWIW, also boot-tested linux-libre-arm64-generic with 5.6 as well. > > > live well, > vagrant From a quick test I made, support for the Wireguard VPN or the exfat file system in 5.6 is not activated by default when using 'make oldconfig' or 'make olddefconfig'. I think it would be nice to set them to 'module'.