* [bug#70800] [PATCH] scripts: style: Add 'order' option to alphabetically order file.
@ 2024-05-06 10:50 Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2024-05-25 14:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via @ 2024-05-06 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 70800
Cc: Christopher Baines, Josselin Poiret, Ludovic Courtès,
Mathieu Othacehe, Ricardo Wurmus, Simon Tournier,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
* guix/scripts/style.scm (show-help): Describe option.
(order-packages): Add procedure.
(format-whole-file): Add 'order?' argument.
(%options): Add 'order' option.
(guix-style): Alphabetically order packages in files.
* doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix style): Document option.
Change-Id: I4aa7c0bd0b6d42529ae7d304587ffb10bf5f4006
---
Hi,
I managed to create a procedure which alphabetically sorts top-level
package definitions. Sort is not stable as I understand it, so versions
of packages get swapped. It works well enough in small package modules,
and should not be a problem once package versions are used in sorting.
Cheers,
Herman
doc/guix.texi | 6 +++++
guix/scripts/style.scm | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 1c1e0164e7..6316f6bfc9 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -15097,6 +15097,12 @@ Invoking guix style
guix style -f /etc/config.scm
@end example
+@item --order
+@itemx -o
+Place the top-level package definitions in the given files in alphabetical
+order. This option only has an effect in combination with
+@option{--whole-file}.
+
@item --styling=@var{rule}
@itemx -S @var{rule}
Apply @var{rule}, one of the following styling rules:
diff --git a/guix/scripts/style.scm b/guix/scripts/style.scm
index 211980dc1c..ace28c1bca 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/style.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/style.scm
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
;;; Copyright © 2021-2023 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2024 Herman Rimm <herman@rimm.ee>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@
(define-module (guix scripts style)
#:autoload (gnu packages) (specification->package fold-packages)
+ #:use-module (guix combinators)
#:use-module (guix scripts)
#:use-module ((guix scripts build) #:select (%standard-build-options))
#:use-module (guix ui)
@@ -494,11 +496,43 @@ (define (package-location<? p1 p2)
;;; Whole-file formatting.
;;;
-(define* (format-whole-file file #:rest rest)
- "Reformat all of FILE."
+(define (order-packages lst)
+ "Place top-level package definitions in LST in alphabetical order."
+ ;; Group define-public with preceding blanks and defines.
+ (let* ((lst (identity
+ (fold2 (lambda (expr tail head)
+ (let ((head (cons expr head)))
+ (match expr
+ ((? blank?)
+ (values tail head))
+ (('define _ ...)
+ (values tail head))
+ (_ (values (cons head tail) '())))))
+ '() '() lst)))
+ (package-name (lambda (pkg)
+ (match pkg
+ ((('define-public _ expr) _ ...)
+ (match expr
+ ((or ('package _ ('name name) _ ...)
+ ('package ('name name) _ ...))
+ name)
+ (_ #f)))
+ (_ #f))))
+ (lst (sort lst (lambda (lst1 lst2)
+ (let ((name1 (package-name lst1))
+ (name2 (package-name lst2)))
+ (and name1 name2 (string> name1 name2)))))))
+ (reverse (concatenate lst))))
+
+(define* (format-whole-file file order? #:rest rest)
+ "Reformat all of FILE. When ORDER? is true, top-level package definitions
+ are put in alphabetical order."
(with-fluids ((%default-port-encoding "UTF-8"))
- (let ((lst (call-with-input-file file read-with-comments/sequence
- #:guess-encoding #t)))
+ (let* ((lst (call-with-input-file file read-with-comments/sequence
+ #:guess-encoding #t))
+ (lst (if order?
+ (order-packages lst)
+ lst)))
(with-atomic-file-output file
(lambda (port)
(apply pretty-print-with-comments/splice port lst
@@ -526,6 +560,9 @@ (define %options
(option '(#\f "whole-file") #f #f
(lambda (opt name arg result)
(alist-cons 'whole-file? #t result)))
+ (option '(#\o "order") #f #f
+ (lambda (opt name arg result)
+ (alist-cons 'order? #t result)))
(option '(#\S "styling") #t #f
(lambda (opt name arg result)
(alist-cons 'styling-procedure
@@ -569,7 +606,7 @@ (define (show-help)
(display (G_ "
-S, --styling=RULE apply RULE, a styling rule"))
(display (G_ "
- -l, --list-stylings display the list of available style rules"))
+ -l, --list-stylings display the list of available style rules"))
(newline)
(display (G_ "
-n, --dry-run display files that would be edited but do nothing"))
@@ -584,6 +621,8 @@ (define (show-help)
(newline)
(display (G_ "
-f, --whole-file format the entire contents of the given file(s)"))
+ (display (G_ "
+ -o, --order place the contents in alphabetical order as well"))
(newline)
(display (G_ "
-h, --help display this help and exit"))
@@ -627,7 +666,8 @@ (define-command (guix-style . args)
(warning (G_ "'--styling' option has no effect in whole-file mode~%")))
(when (null? files)
(warning (G_ "no files specified, nothing to do~%")))
- (for-each format-whole-file files))
+ (for-each format-whole-file
+ files (map (const (assoc-ref opts 'order?)) files)))
(let ((packages (filter-map (match-lambda
(('argument . spec)
(specification->package spec))
base-commit: ef8ab6ab66c4d629699d175938ef1912941d4dce
--
2.41.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [bug#70800] [PATCH] scripts: style: Add 'order' option to alphabetically order file.
2024-05-06 10:50 [bug#70800] [PATCH] scripts: style: Add 'order' option to alphabetically order file Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
@ 2024-05-25 14:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-05-31 15:36 ` Simon Tournier
2024-06-26 21:32 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-07-04 15:55 ` [bug#70800] [PATCH v2] scripts: style: Add 'alphabetical-sort' option Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2024-09-02 18:58 ` [bug#70800] [PATCH] " Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2024-05-25 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herman Rimm
Cc: 70800, Josselin Poiret, Simon Tournier, Mathieu Othacehe,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Ricardo Wurmus, Christopher Baines
Herman Rimm <herman@rimm.ee> skribis:
> * guix/scripts/style.scm (show-help): Describe option.
> (order-packages): Add procedure.
> (format-whole-file): Add 'order?' argument.
> (%options): Add 'order' option.
> (guix-style): Alphabetically order packages in files.
> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix style): Document option.
>
> Change-Id: I4aa7c0bd0b6d42529ae7d304587ffb10bf5f4006
Yay!
> I managed to create a procedure which alphabetically sorts top-level
> package definitions. Sort is not stable as I understand it, so versions
> of packages get swapped. It works well enough in small package modules,
> and should not be a problem once package versions are used in sorting.
Maybe use ‘stable-sort’ instead of ‘sort’?
Overall LGTM; some suggestions below:
> +(define (order-packages lst)
> + "Place top-level package definitions in LST in alphabetical order."
“Return LST, a list of top-level expressions and blanks, with top-level
package definitions in alphabetical order.”
> + ;; Group define-public with preceding blanks and defines.
> + (let* ((lst (identity
I’d drop ‘identity’.
> + (package-name (lambda (pkg)
> + (match pkg
> + ((('define-public _ expr) _ ...)
> + (match expr
> + ((or ('package _ ('name name) _ ...)
> + ('package ('name name) _ ...))
> + name)
> + (_ #f)))
> + (_ #f))))
Nitpick: I’d make this an inner ‘define’ in ‘order-packages’, right
below the docstring.
> + (lst (sort lst (lambda (lst1 lst2)
> + (let ((name1 (package-name lst1))
> + (name2 (package-name lst2)))
> + (and name1 name2 (string> name1 name2)))))))
> + (reverse (concatenate lst))))
Maybe replace ‘string>’ by ‘string<?’ and drop ‘reverse’.
> + (option '(#\o "order") #f #f
> + (lambda (opt name arg result)
> + (alist-cons 'order? #t result)))
I’d avoid ‘-o’ for this because it’s usually synonymous with ‘output’.
But maybe make it ‘-A’/‘--alphabetical-sort’?
> (display (G_ "
> - -l, --list-stylings display the list of available style rules"))
> + -l, --list-stylings display the list of available style rules"))
Oops. :-)
> + (for-each format-whole-file
> + files (map (const (assoc-ref opts 'order?)) files)))
I’d go with something less inventive here:
(for-each (cute format-whole-file <> (assoc-ref opts 'order?))
files)
Could you send an updated patch?
Thank you!
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [bug#70800] [PATCH] scripts: style: Add 'order' option to alphabetically order file.
2024-05-25 14:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2024-05-31 15:36 ` Simon Tournier
2024-06-26 21:32 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Simon Tournier @ 2024-05-31 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès, Herman Rimm
Cc: 70800, Josselin Poiret, Mathieu Othacehe, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice,
Ricardo Wurmus, Christopher Baines
Hi,
On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 16:14, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>> I managed to create a procedure which alphabetically sorts top-level
>> package definitions. Sort is not stable as I understand it, so versions
>> of packages get swapped. It works well enough in small package modules,
>> and should not be a problem once package versions are used in sorting.
>
> Maybe use ‘stable-sort’ instead of ‘sort’?
[...]
>> + (lst (sort lst (lambda (lst1 lst2)
>> + (let ((name1 (package-name lst1))
>> + (name2 (package-name lst2)))
>> + (and name1 name2 (string> name1 name2)))))))
>> + (reverse (concatenate lst))))
>
> Maybe replace ‘string>’ by ‘string<?’ and drop ‘reverse’.
I would suggest to use ’sort!’ for an in-place sort. This would avoid
some GC cycles when internally copying since ’lst’ is inside ’let*’.
Moreover, yeah reverse the inequality would avoid the ’reverse’
call. :-)
About the stability, I would suggest something as:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(sort! lst (lambda (lst1 lst2)
(let ((name1 (package-name lst1))
(name2 (package-name lst2)))
(and name1 name2 (or (string<? name1 name2)
(eq? '< (version-compare
(package-version lst1)
(package-version lst2))))))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
with ’version-compare’ from (guix utils). Well, something like
that. :-)
Cheers,
simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [bug#70800] [PATCH] scripts: style: Add 'order' option to alphabetically order file.
2024-05-25 14:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-05-31 15:36 ` Simon Tournier
@ 2024-06-26 21:32 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2024-06-26 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herman Rimm
Cc: 70800, Josselin Poiret, Simon Tournier, Mathieu Othacehe,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Ricardo Wurmus, Christopher Baines
Hi Herman,
Did you have a chance to look into this? Let us know if anything looks
unclear or questionable to you.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
> Herman Rimm <herman@rimm.ee> skribis:
>
>> * guix/scripts/style.scm (show-help): Describe option.
>> (order-packages): Add procedure.
>> (format-whole-file): Add 'order?' argument.
>> (%options): Add 'order' option.
>> (guix-style): Alphabetically order packages in files.
>> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix style): Document option.
>>
>> Change-Id: I4aa7c0bd0b6d42529ae7d304587ffb10bf5f4006
>
> Yay!
>
>> I managed to create a procedure which alphabetically sorts top-level
>> package definitions. Sort is not stable as I understand it, so versions
>> of packages get swapped. It works well enough in small package modules,
>> and should not be a problem once package versions are used in sorting.
>
> Maybe use ‘stable-sort’ instead of ‘sort’?
>
> Overall LGTM; some suggestions below:
>
>> +(define (order-packages lst)
>> + "Place top-level package definitions in LST in alphabetical order."
>
> “Return LST, a list of top-level expressions and blanks, with top-level
> package definitions in alphabetical order.”
>
>> + ;; Group define-public with preceding blanks and defines.
>> + (let* ((lst (identity
>
> I’d drop ‘identity’.
>
>> + (package-name (lambda (pkg)
>> + (match pkg
>> + ((('define-public _ expr) _ ...)
>> + (match expr
>> + ((or ('package _ ('name name) _ ...)
>> + ('package ('name name) _ ...))
>> + name)
>> + (_ #f)))
>> + (_ #f))))
>
> Nitpick: I’d make this an inner ‘define’ in ‘order-packages’, right
> below the docstring.
>
>> + (lst (sort lst (lambda (lst1 lst2)
>> + (let ((name1 (package-name lst1))
>> + (name2 (package-name lst2)))
>> + (and name1 name2 (string> name1 name2)))))))
>> + (reverse (concatenate lst))))
>
> Maybe replace ‘string>’ by ‘string<?’ and drop ‘reverse’.
>
>> + (option '(#\o "order") #f #f
>> + (lambda (opt name arg result)
>> + (alist-cons 'order? #t result)))
>
> I’d avoid ‘-o’ for this because it’s usually synonymous with ‘output’.
>
> But maybe make it ‘-A’/‘--alphabetical-sort’?
>
>> (display (G_ "
>> - -l, --list-stylings display the list of available style rules"))
>> + -l, --list-stylings display the list of available style rules"))
>
> Oops. :-)
>
>> + (for-each format-whole-file
>> + files (map (const (assoc-ref opts 'order?)) files)))
>
> I’d go with something less inventive here:
>
> (for-each (cute format-whole-file <> (assoc-ref opts 'order?))
> files)
>
> Could you send an updated patch?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [bug#70800] [PATCH v2] scripts: style: Add 'alphabetical-sort' option.
2024-05-06 10:50 [bug#70800] [PATCH] scripts: style: Add 'order' option to alphabetically order file Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2024-05-25 14:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2024-07-04 15:55 ` Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2024-07-18 15:12 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-09-02 18:58 ` [bug#70800] [PATCH] " Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via @ 2024-07-04 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 70800
* guix/scripts/style.scm (show-help): Describe option.
(order-packages): Add procedure.
(format-whole-file): Add 'order?' argument.
(%options): Add 'alphabetical-sort' option.
(guix-style): Alphabetically order packages in files.
* doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix style): Document option.
Change-Id: I4aa7c0bd0b6d42529ae7d304587ffb10bf5f4006
---
Hi,
I should have mentioned it back then, but in May and again today I tried
to not use a reverse. If you can do a sort without it, please amend the
patch. This revision takes the other feedback into account.
Cheers,
Herman
doc/guix.texi | 7 ++++
guix/scripts/style.scm | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 6770c9d664..3e598f812b 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -15190,6 +15190,13 @@ configuration (you need write permissions for the file):
guix style -f /etc/config.scm
@end example
+@item --alphabetical-sort
+@itemx -A
+Place the top-level package definitions in the given files in
+alphabetical order. Package definitions with matching names are placed
+with versions in descending order. This option only has an effect in
+combination with @option{--whole-file}.
+
@item --styling=@var{rule}
@itemx -S @var{rule}
Apply @var{rule}, one of the following styling rules:
diff --git a/guix/scripts/style.scm b/guix/scripts/style.scm
index 0727ac1480..5f4ee4a492 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/style.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/style.scm
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
;;; Copyright © 2021-2024 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2024 Herman Rimm <herman@rimm.ee>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@
(define-module (guix scripts style)
#:autoload (gnu packages) (specification->package fold-packages)
+ #:use-module (guix combinators)
#:use-module (guix scripts)
#:use-module ((guix scripts build) #:select (%standard-build-options))
#:use-module (guix ui)
@@ -494,11 +496,62 @@ (define (package-location<? p1 p2)
;;; Whole-file formatting.
;;;
-(define* (format-whole-file file #:rest rest)
- "Reformat all of FILE."
+(define (order-packages lst)
+ "Return LST, a list of top-level expressions and blanks, with
+top-level package definitions in alphabetical order. Packages which
+share a name are placed with versions in descending order."
+ (define (package-name pkg)
+ (match pkg
+ ((('define-public _ expr) _ ...)
+ (match expr
+ ((or ('package _ ('name name) _ ...)
+ ('package ('name name) _ ...))
+ name)
+ (_ #f)))
+ (_ #f)))
+
+ (define (package-version pkg)
+ (match pkg
+ ((('define-public _ expr) _ ...)
+ (match expr
+ ((or ('package _ _ ('version version) _ ...)
+ ('package _ ('version version) _ ...))
+ version)
+ (_ #f)))
+ (_ #f)))
+
+ (define (package>? lst1 lst2)
+ (let ((name1 (package-name lst1))
+ (name2 (package-name lst2))
+ (version1 (package-version lst1))
+ (version2 (package-version lst2)))
+ (and name1 name2 (or (string>? name1 name2)
+ (and (string=? name1 name2)
+ version1
+ version2
+ (version>? version2 version1))))))
+
+ ;; Group define-public with preceding blanks and defines.
+ (let ((lst (fold2 (lambda (expr tail head)
+ (let ((head (cons expr head)))
+ (match expr
+ ((? blank?)
+ (values tail head))
+ (('define _ ...)
+ (values tail head))
+ (_ (values (cons head tail) '())))))
+ '() '() lst)))
+ (reverse (concatenate (sort! lst package>?)))))
+
+(define* (format-whole-file file order? #:rest rest)
+ "Reformat all of FILE. When ORDER? is true, top-level package definitions
+are put in alphabetical order."
(with-fluids ((%default-port-encoding "UTF-8"))
- (let ((lst (call-with-input-file file read-with-comments/sequence
- #:guess-encoding #t)))
+ (let* ((lst (call-with-input-file file read-with-comments/sequence
+ #:guess-encoding #t))
+ (lst (if order?
+ (order-packages lst)
+ lst)))
(with-atomic-file-output file
(lambda (port)
(apply pretty-print-with-comments/splice port lst
@@ -526,6 +579,9 @@ (define %options
(option '(#\f "whole-file") #f #f
(lambda (opt name arg result)
(alist-cons 'whole-file? #t result)))
+ (option '(#\A "--alphabetical-sort") #f #f
+ (lambda (opt name arg result)
+ (alist-cons 'order? #t result)))
(option '(#\S "styling") #t #f
(lambda (opt name arg result)
(alist-cons 'styling-procedure
@@ -569,7 +625,7 @@ (define (show-help)
(display (G_ "
-S, --styling=RULE apply RULE, a styling rule"))
(display (G_ "
- -l, --list-stylings display the list of available style rules"))
+ -l, --list-stylings display the list of available style rules"))
(newline)
(display (G_ "
-n, --dry-run display files that would be edited but do nothing"))
@@ -584,6 +640,9 @@ (define (show-help)
(newline)
(display (G_ "
-f, --whole-file format the entire contents of the given file(s)"))
+ (display (G_ "
+ -A, --alphabetical-sort
+ place the contents in alphabetical order as well"))
(newline)
(display (G_ "
-h, --help display this help and exit"))
@@ -627,7 +686,9 @@ (define (parse-options)
(warning (G_ "'--styling' option has no effect in whole-file mode~%")))
(when (null? files)
(warning (G_ "no files specified, nothing to do~%")))
- (for-each format-whole-file files))
+ (for-each
+ (cute format-whole-file <> (assoc-ref opts 'order?))
+ files))
(let ((packages (filter-map (match-lambda
(('argument . spec)
(specification->package spec))
--
2.45.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [bug#70800] [PATCH v2] scripts: style: Add 'alphabetical-sort' option.
2024-07-04 15:55 ` [bug#70800] [PATCH v2] scripts: style: Add 'alphabetical-sort' option Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
@ 2024-07-18 15:12 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2024-07-18 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herman Rimm; +Cc: 70800
Hi Herman,
Herman Rimm <herman@rimm.ee> skribis:
> * guix/scripts/style.scm (show-help): Describe option.
> (order-packages): Add procedure.
> (format-whole-file): Add 'order?' argument.
> (%options): Add 'alphabetical-sort' option.
> (guix-style): Alphabetically order packages in files.
> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix style): Document option.
>
> Change-Id: I4aa7c0bd0b6d42529ae7d304587ffb10bf5f4006
> ---
> Hi,
>
> I should have mentioned it back then, but in May and again today I tried
> to not use a reverse. If you can do a sort without it, please amend the
> patch. This revision takes the other feedback into account.
This looks great to me, thanks! I realize I forgot to ask you to add
tests to ‘tests/guix-style.sh’—my bad.
Would you be willing and able to submit an updated version with tests?
If not (which I’d understand), I can allocate time to do it.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [bug#70800] [PATCH] scripts: style: Add 'alphabetical-sort' option.
2024-05-06 10:50 [bug#70800] [PATCH] scripts: style: Add 'order' option to alphabetically order file Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2024-05-25 14:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-07-04 15:55 ` [bug#70800] [PATCH v2] scripts: style: Add 'alphabetical-sort' option Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
@ 2024-09-02 18:58 ` Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2024-09-03 9:50 ` bug#70800: " Ludovic Courtès
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via @ 2024-09-02 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 70800
* guix/scripts/style.scm (show-help): Describe option.
(order-packages): Add procedure.
(format-whole-file): Add 'order?' argument.
(%options): Add 'alphabetical-sort' option.
(guix-style): Alphabetically order packages in files.
* tests/guix-style.sh: Test alphabetical ordering.
* doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix style): Document option.
Change-Id: I4aa7c0bd0b6d42529ae7d304587ffb10bf5f4006
---
doc/guix.texi | 7 ++++
guix/scripts/style.scm | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
tests/guix-style.sh | 26 +++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index f7dbe246a9..6f6f952f96 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -15216,6 +15216,13 @@ configuration (you need write permissions for the file):
guix style -f /etc/config.scm
@end example
+@item --alphabetical-sort
+@itemx -A
+Place the top-level package definitions in the given files in
+alphabetical order. Package definitions with matching names are placed
+with versions in descending order. This option only has an effect in
+combination with @option{--whole-file}.
+
@item --styling=@var{rule}
@itemx -S @var{rule}
Apply @var{rule}, one of the following styling rules:
diff --git a/guix/scripts/style.scm b/guix/scripts/style.scm
index 1802b854d0..73e3feadee 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/style.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/style.scm
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
;;; Copyright © 2021-2024 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2024 Herman Rimm <herman@rimm.ee>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@
(define-module (guix scripts style)
#:autoload (gnu packages) (specification->package fold-packages)
+ #:use-module (guix combinators)
#:use-module (guix scripts)
#:use-module ((guix scripts build) #:select (%standard-build-options))
#:use-module (guix ui)
@@ -485,11 +487,62 @@ (define* (format-package-definition package
;;; Whole-file formatting.
;;;
-(define* (format-whole-file file #:rest rest)
- "Reformat all of FILE."
+(define (order-packages lst)
+ "Return LST, a list of top-level expressions and blanks, with
+top-level package definitions in alphabetical order. Packages which
+share a name are placed with versions in descending order."
+ (define (package-name pkg)
+ (match pkg
+ ((('define-public _ expr) _ ...)
+ (match expr
+ ((or ('package _ ('name name) _ ...)
+ ('package ('name name) _ ...))
+ name)
+ (_ #f)))
+ (_ #f)))
+
+ (define (package-version pkg)
+ (match pkg
+ ((('define-public _ expr) _ ...)
+ (match expr
+ ((or ('package _ _ ('version version) _ ...)
+ ('package _ ('version version) _ ...))
+ version)
+ (_ #f)))
+ (_ #f)))
+
+ (define (package>? lst1 lst2)
+ (let ((name1 (package-name lst1))
+ (name2 (package-name lst2))
+ (version1 (package-version lst1))
+ (version2 (package-version lst2)))
+ (and name1 name2 (or (string>? name1 name2)
+ (and (string=? name1 name2)
+ version1
+ version2
+ (version>? version2 version1))))))
+
+ ;; Group define-public with preceding blanks and defines.
+ (let ((lst (fold2 (lambda (expr tail head)
+ (let ((head (cons expr head)))
+ (match expr
+ ((? blank?)
+ (values tail head))
+ (('define _ ...)
+ (values tail head))
+ (_ (values (cons head tail) '())))))
+ '() '() lst)))
+ (reverse (concatenate (sort! lst package>?)))))
+
+(define* (format-whole-file file order? #:rest rest)
+ "Reformat all of FILE. When ORDER? is true, top-level package definitions
+are put in alphabetical order."
(with-fluids ((%default-port-encoding "UTF-8"))
- (let ((lst (call-with-input-file file read-with-comments/sequence
- #:guess-encoding #t)))
+ (let* ((lst (call-with-input-file file read-with-comments/sequence
+ #:guess-encoding #t))
+ (lst (if order?
+ (order-packages lst)
+ lst)))
(with-atomic-file-output file
(lambda (port)
(apply pretty-print-with-comments/splice port lst
@@ -517,6 +570,9 @@ (define %options
(option '(#\f "whole-file") #f #f
(lambda (opt name arg result)
(alist-cons 'whole-file? #t result)))
+ (option '(#\A "--alphabetical-sort") #f #f
+ (lambda (opt name arg result)
+ (alist-cons 'order? #t result)))
(option '(#\S "styling") #t #f
(lambda (opt name arg result)
(alist-cons 'styling-procedure
@@ -560,7 +616,7 @@ (define (show-help)
(display (G_ "
-S, --styling=RULE apply RULE, a styling rule"))
(display (G_ "
- -l, --list-stylings display the list of available style rules"))
+ -l, --list-stylings display the list of available style rules"))
(newline)
(display (G_ "
-n, --dry-run display files that would be edited but do nothing"))
@@ -575,6 +631,9 @@ (define (show-help)
(newline)
(display (G_ "
-f, --whole-file format the entire contents of the given file(s)"))
+ (display (G_ "
+ -A, --alphabetical-sort
+ place the contents in alphabetical order as well"))
(newline)
(display (G_ "
-h, --help display this help and exit"))
@@ -618,7 +677,9 @@ (define (parse-options)
(warning (G_ "'--styling' option has no effect in whole-file mode~%")))
(when (null? files)
(warning (G_ "no files specified, nothing to do~%")))
- (for-each format-whole-file files))
+ (for-each
+ (cute format-whole-file <> (assoc-ref opts 'order?))
+ files))
(let ((packages (filter-map (match-lambda
(('argument . spec)
(specification->package spec))
diff --git a/tests/guix-style.sh b/tests/guix-style.sh
index 2de879d5e3..9333139435 100644
--- a/tests/guix-style.sh
+++ b/tests/guix-style.sh
@@ -58,6 +58,24 @@ cat > "$tmpfile" <<EOF
;; The services.
(services
(cons (service mcron-service-type) %base-services)))
+;; Incomplete package definitions in alphabetical order.
+
+(define-public pkg
+ (package
+ (name "bar")
+ (version "2")))
+
+;; The comment below belongs to the foo package.
+(define-public pkg
+ (package
+ (name "bar")
+ (version "1")))
+;; Incomplete package definitions in alphabetical order.
+
+(define-public pkg
+ (package
+ (name "foo")
+ (version "2")))
EOF
cp "$tmpfile" "$tmpfile.bak"
@@ -78,3 +96,11 @@ test "$initial_hash" != "$(guix hash "$tmpfile")"
guix style -f "$tmpfile"
test "$initial_hash" = "$(guix hash "$tmpfile")"
+
+# Swap foo and bar packages.
+sed -i "$tmpfile" -e 's/"foo"/"bar"/g'
+sed -i "$tmpfile" -e '0,/"bar"/{s//"foo"/}'
+test "$initial_hash" != "$(guix hash "$tmpfile")"
+
+guix style -fA "$tmpfile"
+test "$initial_hash" = "$(guix hash "$tmpfile")"
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#70800: [PATCH] scripts: style: Add 'alphabetical-sort' option.
2024-09-02 18:58 ` [bug#70800] [PATCH] " Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
@ 2024-09-03 9:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2024-09-03 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herman Rimm; +Cc: 70800-done
Hi Herman,
Herman Rimm <herman@rimm.ee> skribis:
> * guix/scripts/style.scm (show-help): Describe option.
> (order-packages): Add procedure.
> (format-whole-file): Add 'order?' argument.
> (%options): Add 'alphabetical-sort' option.
> (guix-style): Alphabetically order packages in files.
> * tests/guix-style.sh: Test alphabetical ordering.
> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix style): Document option.
>
> Change-Id: I4aa7c0bd0b6d42529ae7d304587ffb10bf5f4006
Finally applied, thank you!
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-03 9:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-06 10:50 [bug#70800] [PATCH] scripts: style: Add 'order' option to alphabetically order file Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2024-05-25 14:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-05-31 15:36 ` Simon Tournier
2024-06-26 21:32 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-07-04 15:55 ` [bug#70800] [PATCH v2] scripts: style: Add 'alphabetical-sort' option Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2024-07-18 15:12 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-09-02 18:58 ` [bug#70800] [PATCH] " Herman Rimm via Guix-patches via
2024-09-03 9:50 ` bug#70800: " Ludovic Courtès
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).