Konrad Hinsen skribis: > diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm > index 64ffd93e60..c22d5f6565 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm > @@ -3462,20 +3462,20 @@ (define-public ecl-chunga > (sbcl-package->ecl-package sbcl-chunga)) > > (define-public sbcl-ciel > [...] > + (outputs '("out" "image")) > + (arguments > + (list > + #:phases > + #~(modify-phases %standard-phases > + (add-after 'create-asdf-configuration 'build-image > + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys) > + (build-image > + (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "image") "/bin/ciel") > + outputs > + #:dependencies '("ciel"))))))) > (home-page "http://ciel-lang.org/") > (synopsis "CIEL Is an Extended Lisp") > (description Hi. Is building the core image useful, given that the sbcl-ciel-repl package will contain the binary with the same included features? If yes, it would be better to put it in the "lib/" directory instead of "bin/" (e.g. SBCL puts the default core image in "lib/sbcl/").