[bug#73056] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: cl-ciel: Update to 0.2.1

[Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1233 bytes --]

Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net> skribis:

> diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
> index 64ffd93e60..c22d5f6565 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm
> @@ -3462,20 +3462,20 @@ (define-public ecl-chunga
>    (sbcl-package->ecl-package sbcl-chunga))
>  
>  (define-public sbcl-ciel
>  [...]
> +      (outputs '("out" "image"))
> +      (arguments
> +       (list
> +        #:phases
> +        #~(modify-phases %standard-phases
> +            (add-after 'create-asdf-configuration 'build-image
> +              (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> +                (build-image
> +                 (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "image") "/bin/ciel")
> +                 outputs
> +                 #:dependencies '("ciel")))))))
>        (home-page "http://ciel-lang.org/")
>        (synopsis "CIEL Is an Extended Lisp")
>        (description

Hi.
Is building the core image useful, given that the sbcl-ciel-repl package
will contain the binary with the same included features?
If yes, it would be better to put it in the "lib/" directory instead of
"bin/" (e.g. SBCL puts the default core image in "lib/sbcl/").

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]