From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id WBbkKrg2NmfOggAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 17:43:20 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id WBbkKrg2NmfOggAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:43:20 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=jQqS842+; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=subvertising.org header.s=stigmate header.b=foLSA7eU; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1731606200; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=0QjcHQWeZ5u48iBk45XuSeGCx4mJ9jSDjrRjZ+TJjoU=; b=amvw2FG98jO/+ssHqD5qhDGp8Mw8TFSXWiuMMK9kAUTVD/YlgjLq3lQeS+DXlItSzoPLBp +kKYwZP32Wf7KypJzDWjpB3wDilLva2G5Nq2t3lZIZYc1t3OuAD18G9mFBiZFyqZsS1Syo ENt6egTbKxDy4ZeAGCAHjAqdi8wxBVVKZGY+iyOezPbnLFqYiZf8DnraSLBOK35VwdxkHn Eg4UvKeAvHzkGBLmWczuJM6q+C67pexE6Yz0Zvmx9GjdkP/mCGQ4p+4ZopMz7BI++f6y+2 mw2km24ITZgym6pmpT2ct7+NvdAMWSv0StmbLuXDogLqyiOO0IlVTuVGFtNkuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=jQqS842+; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=subvertising.org header.s=stigmate header.b=foLSA7eU; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1731606200; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=C8vwHh0Cp1GFjfIeUhwhuY0bL9rUSuvw7N+zzbMsHFGKnurlLMRLO3TLP0s8lB2V4Mhljh ne/mV1p+qXXTZGDlosq4BusDa+xewZkBqPSf4Z8E7XWVmx5pOGPSmqou+l5UNcM7FzQ1sw XnEJAmNh30dIZffCH1sZyW7UPtvLmK/T/NxhmB0VsCoBEkVu4Q/1EqAB/gX/MEulKmdDwq DLb21J921pQda144ArnLeIfVw9vydr39dW8TDbbSnX8MCLJXTc85nDmQOgSa1O7l3DphVt D50F0TVUHt5pgRSKs9oZuxMJT3aEo+dLQhYmHdcJXKkz+hvgYxAFabLlNmdaSQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CA12456CA for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:43:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBds1-0005tz-Ng; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:43:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBdry-0005sL-LM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:43:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBdry-00070O-C2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:43:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=0QjcHQWeZ5u48iBk45XuSeGCx4mJ9jSDjrRjZ+TJjoU=; b=jQqS842+ViDCqA58jEy8j33gKAZzaPqyyB9EryJdRhbrn5EtIr2Uxb/iOHXJmSFVJ/PW/CzB0GBx9xBU7mszDtJst+jEsw2UFE6I6vCIyTRQq9EPUha4b4tD059tN7JVw/qa/cdBJAnexxwMmlAYT3XP2/zZKDCHtyNNtTdjP7ak9cscTOvIidd12odBLte1R4f15p/9YMpM5WI1paFWuzPUkocf31IsAJPB3MvE9hMYdJD1K0WCJ5Ns+SX+zmKiynyd4h0YI24vqMOYzH8oe+6VjJLc+vEE/mLzb9hglQEzQkZQtSqQcSHYRjjiVbxkCA0r+6hnylCWGoqAlgBnzw==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tBdry-0002ia-6m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:43:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#67921] [PATCH v3 01/24] gnu: ghc: More robust build with binutils =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=89=A5?= 2.39. Resent-From: Divya Ranjan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 17:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67921 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch moreinfo To: Nicolas Graves Cc: dev@jpoiret.xyz, Lars-Dominik Braun , saku@laesvuori.fi, 67921@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 67921-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67921.173160616510424 (code B ref 67921); Thu, 14 Nov 2024 17:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 67921) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2024 17:42:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47065 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tBdrg-0002i4-Gj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:42:44 -0500 Received: from devianza.investici.org ([198.167.222.108]:33987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tBdrd-0002hu-HX for 67921@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:42:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=subvertising.org; s=stigmate; t=1731606160; bh=0QjcHQWeZ5u48iBk45XuSeGCx4mJ9jSDjrRjZ+TJjoU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=foLSA7eURb26s9Kz5pNUEBSgiToXBAPutX4q/agFNnE2/7NwCqX2AIzFdSJsdGabU 1qplCvRrG3DWQwOdgtKjEJ9tJpOJpTDswEL2PmtEAjo7us5GraO3QeBN6ePePHNr7X IOZm2eJIembojjtheZ7Rnhwjts4CYO3DKxU8Wnro= Received: from mx2.investici.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by devianza.investici.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Xq6tS3mw6z6vJG; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 17:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [198.167.222.108] (mx2.investici.org [198.167.222.108]) (Authenticated sender: divya@subvertising.org) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Xq6tR1gKXz6vJ0; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 17:42:39 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87a5e34l73.fsf@ngraves.fr> (Nicolas Graves's message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2024 09:00:48 +0100") References: <20241031125127.14080-1-ngraves@ngraves.fr> <20241031125127.14080-2-ngraves@ngraves.fr> <87bjz09xqs.fsf@ngraves.fr> <87h68p322g.fsf@ngraves.fr> <871pzfwxix.fsf@subvertising.org> <87a5e34l73.fsf@ngraves.fr> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 17:42:29 +0000 Message-ID: <875xop3e62.fsf@subvertising.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Divya Ranjan X-ACL-Warn: , Divya Ranjan via Guix-patches From: Divya Ranjan via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5CA12456CA X-TUID: CBqR/P65j4JE Nicolas Graves writes: > On 2024-11-13 04:47, Divya Ranjan via Guix-patches via wrote: > >> Hello Nicholas, Lars and others. >> >> I=E2=80=99ve planned to pick up the work needed for this upgrade. Where = are we >> and what more work is needed? A brief summary with specific tasks >> would help me get started. > > I haven't managed to get much more done. What happened is that > core-updates broke the original patch series, the patch I added fixes > the build of version 9.4.8 and makes a previous patch unnecessary, but > the way I wrote it required to build from versions 8.6 (basically one > entire day of pure build on my machine). > > If I were to rebuild everything from 8.6 once again, I would actually > rather try the #:make-flag EXTRA_HC_OPTS (IIRC) which is definitely the > same thing in 9.4.8, but it wasn't that clear in 8.6. Is building everything from 8.6 a good idea though? Is it /that/ broken? > From there you'll see that some tests for 9.6 are still broken. I last > was working on decoupling the build (which works) from the tests (some > still failed, hard to understand why), because the rebuild is huge and > makes iterations quite painful. But even that is hard since you would > need the hadrian test phase to be run to get the necessary files > (hadrian config for tests and some binaries) to run tests independently > in another guix package. IIRC I stopped there but still have some > progress in my stash.=20 Okay, is there any particular reason why this is being so hard? I haven=E2= =80=99t seen such problems with Nix. Regards, --=20 Divya Ranjan, Philosophy, Mathematics, Libre Software.