From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35123)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1czQzV-0000xE-Hr
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:56:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1czQzS-0003gX-Gk
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:56:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51005)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1czQzS-0003fu-6o
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:56:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1czQzR-0005H1-TA
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:56:01 -0400
Subject: bug#26502: [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.26502.B26502.149227531120207@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c8931017.AEAAJEBS1hQAAAAAAAAAAAOtUOAAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY8TA4@mailjet.com>
References: <c8931017.AEAAJEBS1hQAAAAAAAAAAAOtUOAAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY8TA4@mailjet.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:55:07 +0200
Message-ID: <874lxpobkk.fsf@fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>, 26502@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> writes:

> * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (racket): Update to 6.8.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/scheme.scm | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

LGTM. Trivial changes like these are generally OK to push without going
through this list as outlined in HACKING.

Just be mindful about the amount of rebuilds it will cause. If `guix
refresh -l <package>` prints more than ~300 dependents, it should go
through the "staging" or "core-updates" branch. See this thread for the
branching strategy:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html

Thanks a lot for your contributions!

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAljyUGsACgkQoqBt8qM6
VPphrwf/Zo9iXLm/r1jcu7t6CIhdA8g1I+WDIFogZt/2sYVDsChCg26xhc5P7BsM
XuZFlGPXYzHoIhsztLpXbL0f+ydRGNZIuq4j858F/pNow5fbvKgxTarALeOVIivl
DnxqmC2w/z+5qN6xu1oaTsFCh0xyzqbpJs6dE6u6kQ1TK2XQ09wU9aY9jkHBcR0A
ldSYWXZu8Xvsg1imqtEZuhJXSIZZoUmkJ2t5sghSXPDcDztO+toBt4mR9pWMmHuR
0pkbyGz+WOrXNc9WYWtr7e83zbhirRK3N5/Sw0L5UNCqv4ZLX/n13faOy2FONiuZ
mu2c+Qp0w+iMF8pxPlxDib2HcGnRtg==
=pk2j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--