From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czRQc-0004nc-Fa for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:24:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czRQY-0000cq-H9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:24:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czRQY-0000cU-Cd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czRQY-0007j1-3h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:24:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26339: [PATCH 07/18] system: Add bootloader type. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20170402135242.2958-1-m.othacehe@gmail.com> <20170402135242.2958-7-m.othacehe@gmail.com> <20170415182634.4e2f9c68@scratchpost.org> From: Mathieu Othacehe In-reply-to: <20170415182634.4e2f9c68@scratchpost.org> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:23:13 +0200 Message-ID: <874lxpinzy.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 26339@debbugs.gnu.org > Oh, so that's how. I think it would be nice-to-have if the user could also override the bootloader package used. The user could already write : --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (bootloader-configuration (inherit %grub-configuration) (bootloader my-grub)) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Or am I wrong here ? > >> - (install-procedure install-syslinux))) > > Wait, so install-syslinux wouldn't need to be exported from this module at all, right? > > Still nice that the user can use it - though is it worth exposing the installers? I'm not sure here, maybe not exposing installers would be better here. > > Otherwise LGTM! Thanks, Mathieu