From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drlBc-0001bF-ED for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:25:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drlBW-0005kd-SF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:25:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drlBW-0005kT-PA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:25:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drlBW-0000Ax-7z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:25:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28425] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: sqlite: Update to 3.20.1. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20170911221745.13947-1-jlicht@fsfe.org> <20170911221745.13947-2-jlicht@fsfe.org> From: Jelle Licht In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:24:02 +0200 Message-ID: <874ls89hjh.fsf@fsfe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Catonano Cc: 28425@debbugs.gnu.org Catonano writes: > 2017-09-12 0:17 GMT+02:00 Jelle Licht : > >> * gnu/packages/databases.scm (sqlite): Update to 3.20.1. >> --- >> gnu/packages/databases.scm | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/databases.scm b/gnu/packages/databases.scm >> index ba365523d..37890a91f 100644 >> --- a/gnu/packages/databases.scm >> +++ b/gnu/packages/databases.scm >> @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ for example from a shell script.") >> (define-public sqlite >> (package >> (name "sqlite") >> - (version "3.19.3") >> + (version "3.20.1") >> (source (origin >> (method url-fetch) >> (uri (let ((numeric-version >> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ for example from a shell script.") >> numeric-version ".tar.gz"))) >> (sha256 >> (base32 >> - "00b3l2qglpl1inx21fckiwxnfq5xf6441flc79rqg7zdvh1rq4h6")))) >> + "0hh7jnxfwvs2qlvmjwrgkvxb8sk4x8hj04m54fq9h1xw55dmjrpc")))) >> (build-system gnu-build-system) >> (inputs `(("readline" ,readline))) >> (arguments >> -- >> 2.14.1 >> >> >> >> >> > > It just built successfully. > > Are there any more checsks/tests I should perform in order to properly > review this ? If you have the time, you could try building and using something which depends on sqlite. I have verified python-apsw (my other patch) to work properly already, but there are lots of dependents of sqlite which might inadvertently break because of my patch.