From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtxkM-0000QN-IS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:14:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtxkI-0000Md-I8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:14:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37896) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtxkI-0000MX-EA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:14:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtxkI-0003vu-8z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:14:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28491] [PATCH] doc: Add "Sending a Patch Series" subsection. Resent-Message-ID: From: Nicolas Goaziou In-Reply-To: <87377k3wz3.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:25:20 +0200") References: <20170918092030.9691-1-janneke@gnu.org> <87h8w089a5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87377k3wz3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:13:00 +0200 Message-ID: <874ls0ca6b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: 28491@debbugs.gnu.org Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Thanks, changed both instances from @xref{} to (@pxref{..}), similar to > other usage. Looks good. @pxref after a comma was fine, too. > +When sending a patch series (e.g., using @code{git send-email}), please > +first send one message to @email{guix-patches@@gnu.org}, and then send > +subsequent patches to @email{@var{NNN}@@debbugs.gnu.org} to make sure > +they are kept together. See > +@uref{https://debbugs.gnu.org/Advanced.html, the Debbugs documentation} > +for more information. > +@c Debbugs bug: https://debbugs.gnu.org/db/15/15361.html Would it make sense to recall the need to close the thread by answering to ? This information is surprisingly hard to find. Regards,