From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxXsJ-0000ea-Am for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 08:25:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxXsF-0006xS-DJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 08:25:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxXsF-0006xL-0F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 08:25:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dxXsE-0005ws-Q2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 08:25:02 -0400 Subject: bug#27683: [PATCH] gnu: libjaylink: Update to 699b700. openocd: Update to 0.10.0 Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20170713095923.4115-1-theodoros.for@openmailbox.org> <87wp4lgv3v.fsf@foradis.org> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:24:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wp4lgv3v.fsf@foradis.org> (Theodoros Foradis's message of "Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:42:40 +0300") Message-ID: <874lrnt3it.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Theodoros Foradis Cc: 27683-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Theodoros, Theodoros Foradis skribis: >> Overall the changes look good to me, but can you clarify if they need to >> be applied in the same commit like this? > > It has been some time since I submitted version 2 of the patch, > splitting it in two. > > I revisited the patch and it wouldn't apply on master, so I reply with > the rebased patch that applies on current master. I went ahead and applied both. Sorry that it took so long! Thank you, Ludo=E2=80=99.