From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51591) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM0Sl-0007fL-Ge for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 20:20:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM0Sg-0001MZ-HB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 20:20:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39171) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM0Sg-0001MQ-DI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 20:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fM0Sg-0001bR-4e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 20:20:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#31570] [PATCH 0/2] gnu: javacc: Bootstrap from javacc-4 instead of bootstrap binary. Resent-Message-ID: From: Alex Vong References: <871se2jnya.fsf@gmail.com> <877entcss1.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87fu2gbzgn.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 08:19:34 +0800 In-Reply-To: <87fu2gbzgn.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Vong's message of "Fri, 25 May 2018 03:55:36 +0800") Message-ID: <874liwbn8p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: alexvong1995@gmail.com, 31570@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alex Vong writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > > [...] >> Can we delete these things in a snippet instead? >> >> (I vaguely remember that we didn=E2=80=99t use snippets for jars because >> patch-and-repack wouldn=E2=80=99t support the jar format, but I don=E2= =80=99t know if >> that=E2=80=99s still the case.) > > Indeed, it fails to build if I switch to use snippet. But I manage to > fix it by adding java-junit to native-inputs :) (since the error message > seems to be related to some missing junit symbols). Will send a revised > patch series later. I decide to remove the tests instead of adding junit to native-inputs since we are not running the tests for javacc-4 anyway. Here come the patch series: --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQTdXC2pN4kXBjiMDs8cGaIXrbrArQUCWwdWlwAKCRAcGaIXrbrA rZgIAQCCFLfFvlTYzg5uCG3m/iu7r+laMzUgE6izUYnGVEqKIAEAvCqTnrRja9uN V79/XitVgnTMfhl3FL9FNsMyRHGTZQI= =SR9A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--