From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40023) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxCyu-0002Mg-Ty for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 11:11:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxCys-0005p1-RW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 11:11:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxCys-0005os-Ng for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 11:11:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fxCys-0000wV-FU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 11:11:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#32579] [PATCH] gnu: Add guile-mingw 2.2.3. Resent-Message-ID: From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen References: <87sh2xrod8.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3ciuvtv.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhwyfea9.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnxtcvg9.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 17:10:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pnxtcvg9.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:12:54 +0200") Message-ID: <874lf5i9i7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 32579@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> Well, if wip-mingw-guile-2.2 is merged; yes. I'm not sure why that >> hasn't happened yet, so there may be issues? > > Good question! It could be that simply nobody took the time to look > into it. If it can be chopped in small sizable chunks, I can take a > look and cherry-pick from it. If you have suggestions or guidance, > that=E2=80=99s very welcome! It's ~25 commits on top of a 6month old stable-2.2; it rebases without problems on current stable-2.2. > Regarding the package itself: I=E2=80=99m inclined to not include it in G= uix > proper and instead work on applying the fixes in =E2=80=98stable-2.2=E2= =80=99. > > Is it OK for you? Yes; I wanted to share this packaging. So then this bug would/could change to: merge wip-mingw-guile-2.2 or something. janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com