From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTZwd-0002Ea-15 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 18:15:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTZwc-0003R6-1r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 18:15:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTZwb-0003Qx-VA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 18:15:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTZwb-0001Dv-OD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 18:15:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#37991] (no subject) Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87d0e3qwg6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20191030130836.728314-1-josh@inv.alid.pw> <87ftja4bp0.fsf@inv.alid.pw> <87eeyn5m5n.fsf@gnu.org> <87wocd6nbh.fsf@inv.alid.pw> <87d0e3qwg6.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 00:14:00 +0100 Message-ID: <874kzcmymf.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Josh Holland Cc: 37991@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi Josh, > > Josh Holland skribis: > >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >>> Could you check =E2=80=98guix size redshift=E2=80=99 vs. =E2=80=98guix = size redshift-wayland=E2=80=99, >>> to estimate the cost of supporting both X and Wayland? >> $ ./pre-inst-env guix size redshift > > [...] > >> total: 126.6 MiB >> >> $ ./pre-inst-env guix size redshift-wayland > > [...] > >> total: 136.7 MiB >> >> >>> If the cost in size is too important, then we could keep separate >>> packages, but in that case one should inherit from the other to reduce >>> duplication. >> >> I agree, but IMO 10 MiB is fairly insignificant. My only reservation is >> that this isn't a formally released package, but I've been using it for >> a week or so without any issues (though I haven't tested it on an X11 >> system). > > I agree. > > So, could you send a patch that updates =E2=80=98redshift=E2=80=99 to thi= s snapshot and > adds Wayland support? Just add a comment stating why we=E2=80=99re using= this > snapshot instead of the latest release. Since this Wayland variant is a fork of Redshift, I think it is better to keep it as a separate package for now. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl3HSDgACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPoQOQf+NJqmPB7SgBBJJx9TNemD8MkxE0r/nv0vII87jPjA5EDyyGtm/m2AWfa6 jejgdN+kTa18iFziwFsxVvah61fQq2Oo1Q+uQOMbk8O6lVHmpAblj8PSQLuIw7ny BnrECuapBlRIJ/LCc5dGghnt7e3deKasskl/mJm9/2RE2FANh23UO5m8ZHfoPC/y vu7R6ygehaHzQJLD0/ZfpvRnVQgTP/Zon8lLJArC1+cW1nLiCiIojz20/PI2svMQ gzWpNtYcXqYVjut3pZU2tltCb40p5DM8Ro54NQgNeP5ZMgIwmlMWOVUbdN4igXB2 jzk/qQy43/cxPv2t7b4TYj9lEcFITg== =L5xT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--