From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itSaN-0004xg-F8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 03:39:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itSaM-0004yS-68 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 03:39:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itSaM-0004yO-3F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 03:39:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itSaM-0006DW-1n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 03:39:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39049] guix-install.sh: Create an init profile for better out-of-the-box experience on foreign distros Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <878sm611yh.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:38:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Prafulla Giri's message of "Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:39:13 +0545") Message-ID: <874kwqjzef.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Prafulla Giri Cc: 39049@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Prafulla Giri skribis: > /etc/profile.d/*.sh seems to be the norm these days. All the debian-based > distros that I have used seem to have it (Mint, Elementary, Ubuntu, etc.) > and even Alpine Linux's docker containers support them. OK, great. > I didn't really think this patch will get merged in one go. I did find > another thing that I could add to this patch the other day but had not > gotten around to updating this. It is regarding the infopath: setting it = to > contain _GUIX_PROFILE/share/info seems to be a good default to have, esp. > because it isn't exported by `guix package --search-paths`. I ran into th= is > issue just the other day, myself. I wish I had made haste to send in an > update. I agree that it=E2=80=99d be nice! > Should I send in a patch, sir? And do I send it in this thread or should I > do it in another one, please? Could you send another patch to guix-patches@gnu.org? Thank you, Ludo=E2=80=99.