From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49265)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jE1XT-0006lc-SG
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:01:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jE1XS-0000EO-KY
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:01:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60222)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jE1XS-0000BP-D6
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:01:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jE1XS-00037z-BF
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:01:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#39804] [PATCH] gnu: add emacs-exwm-next package (i.e. exwm for
 emacs-next)
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39804.B39804.158441040511863@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
References: <87blplqcdd.fsf@web.de> <8736aw8igd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87tv3bd6v1.fsf@web.de> <878skn5cys.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <b4cbb0be620be359281742d5c6ab10aeac8c5782.camel@student.tugraz.at>
 <87d09ukwnn.fsf@gmail.com> <87zhcn35rl.fsf@gmail.com>
 <3021ddd02db7fe16676875b33c1a404960e21a2e.camel@student.tugraz.at>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:59:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3021ddd02db7fe16676875b33c1a404960e21a2e.camel@student.tugraz.at>
 (Leo Prikler's message of "Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:48:58 +0100")
Message-ID: <874kun68rn.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>
Cc: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>, dario <dario.klingenberg@web.de>, 39804@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Leo!

Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:

> Am Dienstag, den 10.03.2020, 23:54 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
>> Hello Leo,
>> 
>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
>> > 
>> > > Am Freitag, den 28.02.2020, 09:32 +0100 schrieb Pierre Neidhardt:
>> > > > The `#:emacs` field tells the build system which Emacs package
>> > > > to use
>> > > > to
>> > > > build this package.  There may be something that not compatible
>> > > > between
>> > > > our current build system and emacs-next.
>> > > > 
>> > > > I've CC'ed Maxim and Leo, they might know more than me.
>> > > This issue should be addressed by #39375, which is currently
>> > > waiting to
>> > > be pushed to master or staging.
>> > 
>> > If we don't hear back from
>> > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39823 in a day or
>> > two, I'd
>> > be OK with pushing #39375 to master.
>> 
>> There have been no activity or reply on #39823 yet, so feel free to
>> push
>> the workaround discussed earlier (on the master branch is fine).
>> 
>> Maxim
> Following the discussion in 39823, we now have two options.
> 1. loading the library in advance as I do.
> 2. wrapping our code in `(eval ...)'.
> The latter has the advantage of not needing an additional function, but
> both require a build system change.
>
> WDYT?

#1 would be best, as it is a general fix, and we can even add a
 parameter to allow choosing between dynamic vs lexcal evaluation (see
 the doc for `eval', it takes such a parameter and defaults to
 dynamical).

Maxim