From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id AL1yBxnGZF9OYQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:37:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id YHRVAxnGZF8dYQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:37:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B1179403A0 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46656 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJHVe-0004UN-W4 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:37:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJHVW-0004Rw-By for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:37:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJHVW-00038c-2H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:37:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJHVW-0005b7-0f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#43425] [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Update to 0.3.10. Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43425 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Greg Hogan Cc: 43425@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43425-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43425.160043981821501 (code B ref 43425); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 43425) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 14:36:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43936 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJHVR-0005ah-PG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:36:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56676) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJHVP-0005aT-US for 43425@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:36:56 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJHVK-00036d-I6; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:36:50 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:9d9d:97cc:d92a:8ac0] (port=55240 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kJHVJ-0004SG-VT; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:36:50 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87k0ws7bey.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5n1rxo.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgbfz3n7.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:36:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Greg Hogan's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:01:40 -0400") Message-ID: <874knvywvz.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: U/XOVEShlF/W > I was aware of the dependent-count triage but not fully understanding this process. When are commits made to staging (last commit was the merge 13 days ago) and/or core-updates (one > commit since merge 4 days ago)? I see you were able to revert this commit to quiet the rebuilds, does this patch now go into core-updates or is it queued somewhere else? Is there a > preferred time window for submitting highly-dependent revisions? I'm not seeing 'staging' or 'core-updates' annotations among the git logs. We have some time frames when "staging" and "core-updates" are open. Then, those branches are stabilized before being merged to "master". There's no specific schedule, but usually stabilization of those branches is advertised on the mailing list. Right now, I think that the window is open. I rebased your openblas patch, as well as python, llvm, boost and zstd patches on top of core-updates. It will take me a while to build those packages, but I'll keep you informed. > How often is the documentation regenerated? I see the limits changed > in the repo in June but the website has not been refreshed. I thought it was every hour, but the mechanism may be broken. > Is there a threshold for marking oneself in the copyright header? Such as, a simple version and checksum revision is not copyrightable but further changes must be marked? I always forget if a copyright addition is required for a simple update. We should definitely add this information to the "Submitting Patches" section. Thanks, Mathieu