Jonathan Brielmaier writes: > Nice one! Although I find it better to have each update as a seperate > commit. If we stick with this big commit we can at least make the commit > message a bit leaner: > > * gnu/packages/xfce.scm (libxfce4util): Update to 4.16.0. > (xfconf): Update to 4.16.0. > > [arguments]: Remove failing custom-check phase. Disabled tests. > (libxfce4ui): Update to 4.16.0. > > [inputs]: Remove unneeded gtk+-2. > ... > A seperate commit for each update would not build inbetween, because of some (inter)dependencies (libxfce4util, etc...), no? For the commit messages I took the last xfce4 update (to 4.14) as an example (commit 8549e0ca6fd68a57253471436de49b88b2d47e64). If that is/was wrong, I apologize and rewrite them, although I'm not entirely sure how. -- "One basic notion underlying Usenet is that it is a cooperative." Having been on USENET for going on ten years, I disagree with this. The basic notion underlying USENET is the flame. -- Chuq Von Rospach