From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id sPQxOE7GIWADVwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:16:30 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id YLu1M07GIWCEDQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:16:30 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 687AB9403AA for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 23:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36236 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9Fld-0008Ck-1o for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 18:16:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9C5m-0006fx-JJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:21:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9C5m-00047S-3q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:21:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9C5l-0001dJ-Ul for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46340] [PATCH] gnu: Add gnome-recipes. Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 19:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46340 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Leo Prikler Cc: 46340@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46340-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46340.16128120276214 (code B ref 46340); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 19:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 46340) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2021 19:20:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51963 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9C5C-0001c9-VY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:20:27 -0500 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:50947) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9C5A-0001br-KH for 46340@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:20:25 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09603FF803; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 19:20:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <20210206101130.2499-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> <87a6sgus2t.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <95c769c5af07a814d6fce2883cd60d038ad60007.camel@student.tugraz.at> Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:20:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <95c769c5af07a814d6fce2883cd60d038ad60007.camel@student.tugraz.at> (Leo Prikler's message of "Sun, 07 Feb 2021 12:30:42 +0100") Message-ID: <874kimfjtc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 687AB9403AA X-Spam-Score: -2.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: FAAstSE9HXx/ Hello, Leo Prikler writes: > Those are two different projects. It might perhaps be worth packaging > GNOME's libgd inside gnome.scm, but there seems to be no public > release. > Other than that, I merely copied the snippet from gedit, which also has > it as a subproject. Ah OK. Thanks for the information. > Good hint. Should I push this with that change or should I do > something about libgd first? I think pushing that change is fine. The libgd case can be handled later, assuming there is anything to do. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou