From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAwmL-0007vH-Tj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 07:06:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAwmI-0007lZ-NZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 07:06:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAwmI-0007lT-JD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 07:06:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAwmI-0006fO-8q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 07:06:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26815: [PATCH 3/3] vm: Support EFI boot in base image. Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87r2zoygoi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170507143647.21036-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <20170507143647.21036-3-mbakke@fastmail.com> <20170507171814.555ec8b3@scratchpost.org> <87r300xyqq.fsf@fastmail.com> <87d1bjyay3.fsf@fastmail.com> <87efvzl7w8.fsf@gnu.org> <87inl8lbzz.fsf@fastmail.com> <87k25l6872.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2zthdoz.fsf@fastmail.com> <87h90p869s.fsf@gmail.com> <87bmqw52at.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9uwhmk6.fsf@fastmail.com> <87r2zoygoi.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 13:05:07 +0200 Message-ID: <8737c3eobg.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 26815@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Mathieu just pushed the bootloader patch series in =E2=80=98master=E2=80= =99. Excellent news! > However, for the release, I thought it=E2=80=99d be more reasonable to no= t rush > that patch series, which is why the new =E2=80=98version-0.13.0=E2=80=99 = branch does not > have it. > > So now the question is, how can we merge your UEFI work? How much work > is it to have it on =E2=80=98version-0.13.0=E2=80=99 without merging all = the of the > bootloader patch series? The problem was that "grub-efi" and "grub" conflicts in PATH without the bootloader patches. Any ideas for how to use the proper grub-efi object? > It would be awesome if we could quickly find a way to address this, so > we can indeed release tomorrow or later this week. Yay! I've sent an updated patch set, although yet untested due to lack of substitutes! Will get on the OpenSSH bug ASAP. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkcLmQACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpuwwf5AeYPPSC7Zo4OwtZqTtboYOL2Kr4dEClnyFpoI1Io+bwF8ixupcfHjqlh uDHkfnOdDP1/pR2Xs3egZzbJsAm7aqOmytjKUmn5JrXDFVftz4RZhUW4XT3Dw+VG 2e5Bn9NWmmj/s55rJEvCpUEv8O/Y3O9ExlLUxEQbfL5IalD006/ctp1A3RixUOxV uA/q86IzELIKL2/kdgXwVoi2jj+5nU+TDHlTaTT8KzIHoZUI+A0V1GSsbQR94d+e dvVDqie3JszI1hEc2WeA/2z5h+PTcYm9MVs3jd7SbrTY3cpBZkcBMWlsOLnusgDf toErUKGjG84E/QBJ4V0bE76NaPVlvg== =gtof -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--