From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33405)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gQvKN-0007Gz-3b
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 09:24:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gQvKM-0005qS-21
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 09:24:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41856)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gQvKL-0005qO-VO
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 09:24:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gQvKL-0004pA-PR
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 09:24:01 -0500
Subject: [bug#33478] [PATCH] gnu: agda: Upgrade to 2.5.4.2
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33478.B33478.154315578618483@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20181124042450.8500-1-brettg@posteo.net> <87bm6eyxh7.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87zhtxsyin.fsf@posteo.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:22:55 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87zhtxsyin.fsf@posteo.net> (Brett Gilio's message of "Sat, 24
	Nov 2018 20:04:48 -0600")
Message-ID: <8736rpxmm8.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Brett Gilio <brettg@posteo.net>
Cc: 33478@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello Brett,

Brett Gilio <brettg@posteo.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:

[...]

>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> [ 37 of 339] Compiling Agda.Utils.Memo  ( src/full/Agda/Utils/Memo.hs, d=
ist/build/Agda/Utils/Memo.o )
>>
>> src/full/Agda/Utils/Memo.hs:10:1: error:
>>     Bad interface file: /gnu/store/fmq6ybv1m3yr9x2y16gv85nv30df9xw8-ghc-=
hashable-1.2.7.0/lib/ghc-8.4.3/hashable-1.2.7.0/Data/Hashable.hi
>>         Something is amiss; requested module  hashable-1.2.7.0:Data.Hash=
able differs from name found in the interface file hashable-1.2.7.0:Data.Ha=
shable (if these names look the same, try again with -dppr-debug)
>>    |
>> 10 | import Data.Hashable
>>    | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> Could you take a look?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>
> Hi Ludo,
>
> I put it through 20 rounds of building, and dumped the gc and
> everything. I can not replicate it on my end, can we get a third person
> to try it?

I=E2=80=99m not sure what you mean by =E2=80=9C20 rounds=E2=80=9D and =E2=
=80=9Cdumped the gc=E2=80=9D.  I would
expect such a failure to be deterministic.

Are you testing this on =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99?  Which commit?  I tested =
it on top of
63fd9f084a5e345d2edaeaf5e8f435a3130f9edc.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.