From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46766) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhNr1-0006gR-MO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:38:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhNr0-0006zi-P3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:38:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhNr0-0006zY-LH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:38:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhNr0-0002yI-Gl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:38:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#36404] [PATCH 6/6] doc: Add section for 'guix deploy'. Resent-Message-ID: From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) References: <87o92ianbj.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87imsqan66.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87ef3ean4i.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> <87a7e2an3h.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> <875zoqan2e.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> <871rzean1i.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> <87woh698fn.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> <87ftnskqzb.fsf@dustycloud.org> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:35:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ftnskqzb.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Lemmer Webber's message of "Sat, 29 Jun 2019 17:43:04 -0400") Message-ID: <8736jrewq8.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Christopher Lemmer Webber Cc: 36404@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > This phrasing confused me for a second, because it could be just one > machine in that list. > > How about: > > The file should evaluate to a list of @var{machine} objects. > or: > The file should evaluate to a list of @var{} objects. > > Not sure whether the angle brackets help or hurt. I couldn't find anywhere else in the manual where the brackets are used for type names (at least with @var), so I went with the former. > Looks great otherwise. I left a few other comments in response to the > other patches; please review and make changes, but I think there isn't > too much to do to get this in. IMO we should get this in as quickly as > possible; I'd love to do so ideally in the next week so it doesn't > stagnate and so people can start trying to use it. Awesome, I'll get on putting together the revised patch series. > Really thrilling stuff Jakob; great work! It's exciting to have you as > part of the Guix team. Aw, shucks. That made my day. It's exciting to be a part of the Guix team! Regards, Jakob --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAl0YA88ACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2VrJDRAArTKDk76fNjfLS9Pnj9lTtURKasfClbifNG1uyElMKeEV06ifIG+7OcbQ fFrIM02mYhi2Yc4BtDn4Ten9pTfVs7jV26Y2scSjgqieLuoJXq/rESoSzjZOojqa iQkvbbc8afH8QI9nd3Uxy+n1bSWEwR2eoGlV1wkVo8q6rFrB4h5RXsBau/dHn79n dwUIGBJbYA0QlUndgsO8zWruuljZmtdD+/PqO5zpiDzUidFSGdlLM032NynkLLqB Uw0afmA//TVcqYZvdNj5032AMhMXqHECWb1rrHXkVDJaSb6Wtc5NU0RiAg/jwTvx U0ui55EN7FKRnZBrH+tmVoYpaOcQ1Zq38AluXAkSYowBxOftlpQ8cyyoiIkzPqm0 ie/w/a458xxPM1c8+OGjmER4qC4bsdXYwOM4YaN9f1GDDDYgpRJO4jfND7GuYfo+ wfHUszvX48vxTAzKZ2yHidJE8EWkjdWgtF/T2XP5NWMVtZw3hrXColwJFQyGoxCB JZ/qQfF21Y3bv0ElVRO4jq/2n246ovl/EX/XY/9be1ZTX/Qf8l3eWYgCj8yxFGP+ AsvLv6MlM2v+vk9BDySu0fPF1g09zhHPASKDpphmqfqi6xtLgVwsPVyfyQuVr5oc pUNFp54Lw4ZQQNZsTy11m7Ev5nkbh3R3L5ZCJ7h2W9se84O2mds= =jJ17 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--