From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41497)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iMUkK-0008Ka-7z
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:17:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iMUkI-0006LB-1C
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:17:04 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46929)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1iMUkH-0006Kz-Ty
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:17:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iMUkH-0005I0-OQ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:17:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#37817] [PATCH 1/7] gnu: Add cl-heap.,
 [bug#37817] [PATCH 2/7] gnu: Add curry-compose-reader-macros.,
 [bug#37817] [PATCH 3/7] gnu: Add yason.,
 [bug#37817] [PATCH 4/7] gnu: sbcl-iterate: Add missing native input.,
 [bug#37817] [PATCH 5/7] gnu: Add ecl-iterate.,
 [bug#37817] [PATCH 6/7] gnu: Add stefil.,
 [bug#37817] [PATCH 7/7] gnu: Add graph.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.37817.B37817.157165299620297@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
In-Reply-To: <875zkibehy.fsf@yamatai>
References: <87k191x006.fsf@yamatai> <20191018204206.15154-1-glv@posteo.net>
 <87d0eqbgqt.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <875zkibehy.fsf@yamatai>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:16:30 +0200
Message-ID: <8736fmbdz5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>
Cc: 37817@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> writes:

> Also, I saw that there is a 'graph.scm' file with definitions of graph
> related packages. Should I put 'sbcl-graph', 'sbcl-graph-dot' and
> 'sbcl-graph-json' in it, or should I keep them in 'lisp.scm'?

In my understanding, file separation works as follows:

1. Make sure the file compilation graph is as simple as possible.

2. If 1. does not apply (e.g. same complexity is both cases), place the
package where it's most relevant.

3. If neither 1 nor 2 apply, that is, if a package is relevant in both
files, well, do what suits you best :)

Here my intuition would be to leave them in lisp.scm.

Cheers!

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl2thX4ACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH/ciAf/bVoi+7egg9cyzli1X0L6oNTAFeSllRC2lFoCgs/Hs92qmEoZjvmviqrB
rg5WyRWoe8g0NHJO81VMJhEHZfeiuv19Pmrk4SGR0VFiK6xCCXXy5vLlwcuj2/CI
SALJwyYpPrh1M26GJDUcHfWtp0ToBo6Aot2M5MVjKKD0kbxlAYwQRLUkrHRADRLK
SyjIFTN8JQVwFSZXgzoIEw0gpmMDsoAAw9kgVHI4HbsJ+XlHuZu4Hht8KSL85DGO
4bkpuLmSG3r5h/sKy7RHB4uAa8fbN3sK08oFfT1GOi6fto/rYFYISAzydJHNrkpJ
QNYtEKEWNOZNzJ2YZX3s8mNbhEEVzQ==
=Hn9A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--