From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59464)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1idNbs-0006wC-CQ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 19:06:13 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1idNbm-0007wu-BU
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 19:06:08 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41207)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1idNbm-0007vh-6c
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 19:06:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1idNbm-0004VF-27
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 19:06:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#38478] [PATCH 4/4] machine: ssh: <machine-ssh-configuration> can
 include the host key.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38478.B38478.157567710417226@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20191203211557.21145-1-ludo@gnu.org>
 <20191203211557.21145-4-ludo@gnu.org>
 <87d0d4qlc0.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87tv6gatc9.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87eexil1kq.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87a785abti.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2019 01:04:42 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87a785abti.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 06 Dec 2019 13:16:41 +0100")
Message-ID: <8736dx80h1.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: "Jakob L. Kreuze" <zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org>
Cc: 38478@debbugs.gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

> zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> BTW, I=E2=80=99m wondering if we should go further and deprecate missin=
g/#f
>>> =E2=80=98host-key=E2=80=99 fields altogether.  WDYT?
>>>
>>> To me it just seems wiser to have that info within the deploy config
>>> rather than out-of-band in ~/.ssh/known_hosts.
>>
>> I feel that's more in-line with the goals of Guix -- implicitly reading
>> ~/.ssh/known_hosts doesn't seem declarative to me. What's our means for
>> deprecating features like that? A warning message when omitted? If
>> that's the case, I'm definitely on board.
>
> Yup, we can emit a deprecation warning when the key is #f.
>
> So let=E2=80=99s take that route if nobody objects.  It=E2=80=99s easier =
to deprecate it
> now that =E2=80=9Cguix deploy=E2=80=9D is still very new.

Done in commit 2617d956d8ae122128a1ba2cc74983cbd683b042!

Ludo=E2=80=99.