From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHux-0002a9-Ka for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:31:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHuw-0007F4-KZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:31:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53442) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHuw-0007Es-E3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:31:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHuw-0005qD-Af for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:31:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40190] Linux-Libre 5.6 Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <874ku5fkoq.fsf@ponder> References: <87k13gqhrw.fsf@ponder> <87sgi0le3g.fsf@ponder> <87mu87btng.fsf@yucca> <87mu7xg34t.fsf@ponder> <87h7y5g30m.fsf@ponder> <874ku5fkoq.fsf@ponder> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:30:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87369ovbpu.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Vagrant Cascadian , 40190@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Mark H Weaver --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Vagrant Cascadian writes: > On 2020-03-30, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> And the second patch, switching to 5.5... > > And a third, rougher, less well tested patch switching to 5.6... which > could obviously be squashed into the previous patches and maybe skip 5.5 > altogether. 5.5 is not an LTS kernel, so going straight to 5.6 sounds like the right thing to do. However... > diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm.conf b/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm.conf > similarity index 100% > rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm.conf > rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm.conf > diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm64.conf b/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm64.conf > similarity index 100% > rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-arm64.conf > rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-arm64.conf > diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-i686.conf b/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-i686.conf > similarity index 100% > rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-i686.conf > rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-i686.conf > diff --git a/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-x86_64.conf b/gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-x86_64.conf > similarity index 100% > rename from gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.5-x86_64.conf > rename to gnu/packages/aux-files/linux-libre/5.6-x86_64.conf This does not seem right. Surely there are _some_ configuration changes in 5.6? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl6DU+0ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPp31gf/c+RcnqrpEDhckzuKNwgVAtN4YOSbFC/xuF8iv/vswY94RckbsOxshJ+V ahYZYcX4HOf3FntkO+udufpWFcbKTHU7EcZmHTnG4c1I1VMRTuzuwd6pE+gTAST+ JjcwMxrRmArRuXWrGnmeeJK9OdSszWK45BKBE+QUivZGNoelaxeBHmFKotIfYI8O kEDnrON6AYEf8rMlNtuApe9Fe68p4T35SMZhEjGHIwQf8ZMuz7ysJyRFRKUrU6zk wzeqlt7lKOvT35smD8lYTVRkRd+xAXYrrY3TGKdkmwwkCXDslpGz9tOLN9mX24th mYjwDwjV33x4stS8oXmevJUNciGVLw== =Lkuw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--