* [bug#41167] Julia: fix current patches, upgrade to 1.4.1
@ 2020-05-10 8:07 Nicolò Balzarotti
2020-05-13 0:11 ` zimoun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nicolò Balzarotti @ 2020-05-10 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 41167
Hello guix!
In the following patches I:
- fixed current julia: I don't know how, the patch-url is missing
".patch" at the end, leading to a 404. Don't know how it can build
right now
- fixed the julia-SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH-mtime.patch: It's now a meta-patch,
that creates the right patch file, so the current julia version is not
patched, and precompile cache of packages installed with guix is
broken. Still no julia-package is in guix, that's why it went
unnoticed
- Add libwhich (I added it to julia.scm but probably there's a better
place for it)
- Update julia to latest release, v1.4.1. I was finally able to
unbundle the last pieces of bundled software (libwhich). Now julia
is based on llvm-8 (previously on llvm-6) and I measuread a speedup of
~17x on precompile times
- Add the first julia package, julia-compat. If everything is fine, I'll
then submit a big series of packages
Feedback welcome!
Nicolò
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [bug#41167] Julia: fix current patches, upgrade to 1.4.1
2020-05-10 8:07 [bug#41167] Julia: fix current patches, upgrade to 1.4.1 Nicolò Balzarotti
@ 2020-05-13 0:11 ` zimoun
2020-05-13 10:13 ` Nicolò Balzarotti
2020-05-13 11:04 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: zimoun @ 2020-05-13 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolò Balzarotti; +Cc: 41167
Hi Nicolò,
On Sun, 10 May 2020 at 10:08, Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms@gmail.com> wrote:
> - fixed the julia-SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH-mtime.patch: It's now a meta-patch,
> that creates the right patch file, so the current julia version is not
> patched, and precompile cache of packages installed with guix is
> broken. Still no julia-package is in guix, that's why it went
> unnoticed
Does this fix the unreproducible behaviour of Julia? As described in
this bug [1] and discussed at length for v1.3.
> - Update julia to latest release, v1.4.1. I was finally able to
> unbundle the last pieces of bundled software (libwhich). Now julia
> is based on llvm-8 (previously on llvm-6) and I measuread a speedup of
> ~17x on precompile times
Because my machine (of lockdown) is not enough powerful, I cannot
rebuild Julia v1.4.1 with the option '--check'.
Could you report the status on the reproducibility of Julia with this
new version?
BTW, thank you for this important update!
Hope to play with it soon.
Cheers,
simon
ps:
hope that your PhD defense was fine?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [bug#41167] Julia: fix current patches, upgrade to 1.4.1
2020-05-13 0:11 ` zimoun
@ 2020-05-13 10:13 ` Nicolò Balzarotti
2020-05-13 18:38 ` zimoun
2020-05-13 11:04 ` Efraim Flashner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nicolò Balzarotti @ 2020-05-13 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zimoun; +Cc: 41167
Hi Simon!
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Nicolò,
>
> On Sun, 10 May 2020 at 10:08, Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> - fixed the julia-SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH-mtime.patch: It's now a meta-patch,
>> that creates the right patch file, so the current julia version is not
>> patched, and precompile cache of packages installed with guix is
>> broken. Still no julia-package is in guix, that's why it went
>> unnoticed
>
> Does this fix the unreproducible behaviour of Julia? As described in
> this bug [1] and discussed at length for v1.3.
Unfortunately, not (actually not tested, but no changes were made from
1.4.0). I've not received feedback on the long issue I opened [1], so I
think I'll propose one fix at a time hoping this way they'll eventually
merge them.
>
>> - Update julia to latest release, v1.4.1. I was finally able to
>> unbundle the last pieces of bundled software (libwhich). Now julia
>> is based on llvm-8 (previously on llvm-6) and I measuread a speedup of
>> ~17x on precompile times
>
> Because my machine (of lockdown) is not enough powerful, I cannot
> rebuild Julia v1.4.1 with the option '--check'.
> Could you report the status on the reproducibility of Julia with this
> new version?
>
>
> BTW, thank you for this important update!
> Hope to play with it soon.
A new update that adds tests on julia packages and adding more packages
is coming. Please, let me know if you have any package you use
day-by-day so that I can add them to verify everything works.
>
>
[1] https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/34753
> Cheers,
> simon
>
> ps:
> hope that your PhD defense was fine?
My Thesis has been accepted, but due to Covid-related emergency, my
defense has been planned for the last day of this month.
Thanks, Nicolò
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [bug#41167] Julia: fix current patches, upgrade to 1.4.1
2020-05-13 0:11 ` zimoun
2020-05-13 10:13 ` Nicolò Balzarotti
@ 2020-05-13 11:04 ` Efraim Flashner
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2020-05-13 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zimoun; +Cc: 41167, Nicolò Balzarotti
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1815 bytes --]
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 02:11:49AM +0200, zimoun wrote:
> Hi Nicolò,
>
> On Sun, 10 May 2020 at 10:08, Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > - fixed the julia-SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH-mtime.patch: It's now a meta-patch,
> > that creates the right patch file, so the current julia version is not
> > patched, and precompile cache of packages installed with guix is
> > broken. Still no julia-package is in guix, that's why it went
> > unnoticed
>
> Does this fix the unreproducible behaviour of Julia? As described in
> this bug [1] and discussed at length for v1.3.
>
> > - Update julia to latest release, v1.4.1. I was finally able to
> > unbundle the last pieces of bundled software (libwhich). Now julia
> > is based on llvm-8 (previously on llvm-6) and I measuread a speedup of
> > ~17x on precompile times
>
> Because my machine (of lockdown) is not enough powerful, I cannot
> rebuild Julia v1.4.1 with the option '--check'.
> Could you report the status on the reproducibility of Julia with this
> new version?
guix build: error: derivation `/gnu/store/z21c12ijspavaclcins5pja8z1s8wbm0-julia-1.4.1.drv' may not be deterministic: output `/gnu/store/ri931fk8hf5wvagk76zhmwbphq2pwgnp-julia-1.4.1' differs from ?/gnu/store/ri931fk8hf5wvagk76zhmwbphq2pwgnp-julia-1.4.1-check?
I built it on bayfront twice. I'll get the diffoscope output once it
finally builds.
>
>
> BTW, thank you for this important update!
> Hope to play with it soon.
>
>
> Cheers,
> simon
>
> ps:
> hope that your PhD defense was fine?
>
>
>
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [bug#41167] Julia: fix current patches, upgrade to 1.4.1
2020-05-13 10:13 ` Nicolò Balzarotti
@ 2020-05-13 18:38 ` zimoun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: zimoun @ 2020-05-13 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolò Balzarotti; +Cc: 41167
Hi Nicolò,
On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 12:13, Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does this fix the unreproducible behaviour of Julia? As described in
> > this bug [1] and discussed at length for v1.3.
>
> Unfortunately, not (actually not tested, but no changes were made from
> 1.4.0). I've not received feedback on the long issue I opened [1], so I
> think I'll propose one fix at a time hoping this way they'll eventually
> merge them.
Thank you for the explanations.
And please report on guix-devel or on 22304@debuugs.gnu.org or
personally the status of your proposals.
BTW, in the meantime of an hypothetical merge, does it make sense to
add a reproducible Julia package using your unmerged patches?
(define-public julia-reproducible
(package
(inherit julia)
(name "julia-reproducible")
(... patches ...))
> A new update that adds tests on julia packages and adding more packages
> is coming. Please, let me know if you have any package you use
> day-by-day so that I can add them to verify everything works.
Nothing fancy.
When I am back to ideas of my previous job, I play with Krylov linear
solver stuff: LinearOperator.jl, IterativeSolvers.jl, Krylov.jl and
other.
Or time to time I am doing some experiments with Flux, FFTW, packages
in JuliaLinearAlgebra or JuliaMath.
> > hope that your PhD defense was fine?
> My Thesis has been accepted, but due to Covid-related emergency, my
> defense has been planned for the last day of this month.
Wish you all the best!
Cheers,
simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-13 18:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-10 8:07 [bug#41167] Julia: fix current patches, upgrade to 1.4.1 Nicolò Balzarotti
2020-05-13 0:11 ` zimoun
2020-05-13 10:13 ` Nicolò Balzarotti
2020-05-13 18:38 ` zimoun
2020-05-13 11:04 ` Efraim Flashner
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).