From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qKlFMf1WrV/QagAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:38:37 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id mPL3LP1WrV/cGQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:38:37 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BCC0940149 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53714 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdEgG-0003F4-7s for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:38:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdEfj-0002ts-Mq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:38:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdEfi-00085y-9i for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:38:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdEfi-0006P3-4k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44460] Add copyright lines Resent-From: John Soo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44460 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 44460@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44460-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44460.160519547324598 (code B ref 44460); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:38:02 +0000 Received: (at 44460) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2020 15:37:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45384 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdEfY-0006Of-Jr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:37:53 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:43919) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdEfT-0006OQ-Ch for 44460@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:37:50 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f175.google.com with SMTP id z3so4842341pfb.10 for <44460@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:37:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=asu-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+QlHLrytia74Q/ry0fdWukMowPC4XZeJojeyw9/wPlc=; b=TluLqcSbva06Z1Ok6XC5PmbADtu03Mba45qYviNL0nNa7cnR79CfyYH9Nb+GUyI737 JZcE48o4xKnxQo6dvhUiuqNwtBKzOGiGfeReADaJOC/j9FNMqQUhhMK3/N39t+8488ty 1UiJc+N4gROU2HJT6g1peFUpseE9PfJNyfVyri1TkkSW08WM3l66QSqLYVVO2qUmT5HL DybcT7Fa+rCml5gERvgISR8s4MM78GnrfGJV5d4LyP2eDJAjR+r3V2+3ALq/nq5UF8iL KqteGmYrvjSi9T14elHH8f6ELRyhssAYXeingZSjQT/q/NqjRyBCJlY3ELNzoYUW4s/g pSvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+QlHLrytia74Q/ry0fdWukMowPC4XZeJojeyw9/wPlc=; b=Ebpg5NcUcTZ1Ogm8sUNkK39GTkQRQ4UxO14u6KS/d31+ed9b8xTry675ah/bIrzBv5 0fiJPHx397N1aDUCuR0oe64GSqZlBBLFoioDsNmSiwV06JtTYnX4RWexY+49NAMhMPyV PsgU9cZJjWvYrwD3I+SEPuHHvXcjgvnCt5odl79ttQzHE5d5nKyIhPLSi+Ye+qWsdd4d heSslm0fXnEsEOLmp/fTioQF2mP3XBOJ4DDdVvRtd5X2uAYAsrIaHc+3ydbitrxBGtTz UWbkTRCvzIrM3cIiQ/evyQekIkMLR3PmcjR3qVr2KUrHFaA2WS/BJzy48GhaXNVIrTS6 J6lQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321nOXVu6m07L9kJsYbZ/EA1SAuK8fVui1PCTNOo7nGmeVNy8Et fLZn3VQLhD2Jplm9uQAJ7skC4jnWxe+Liw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkaGrVYzjIK6zrjk4+Ya9dP3TKCoMS4rp6PznkT1Pw1Cp2F5TW/lNZf0WKMEJc8ihFegJ/eQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1345:: with SMTP id y5mr7234158pjf.88.1605195461014; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:37:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ecenter ([2600:1700:83b0:8bd0::7a8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7sm7230622pjj.20.2020.11.12.07.37.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:37:40 -0800 (PST) From: John Soo References: <87o8kcv30a.fsf@asu.edu> <878sbeoya2.fsf@asu.edu> <87k0usn9jk.fsf@gnu.org> <87imabok8j.fsf@asu.edu> <87ft5elu45.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:37:39 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87ft5elu45.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:58:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87361eoabg.fsf@asu.edu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=asu-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=TluLqcSb; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=asu.edu (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: 2mMhtnpxc8Cr Hi Ludo, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> * Still not normalized - how can I search for just the child processes >> associated with a particular command? > > Like: > > guix processes | recsel -e 'ClientCommand ~ "xyz"' -p ChildProcess > > ? > > Actually what does =E2=80=9Cnormalized=E2=80=9D mean in this context? Excellent question. I was thinking along the lines of database normalization. The default output has multi-valued fields for child processes, so the idea is to make them their own record set. Does that make sense? An aside - Probably to be entirely honest about normalizing the output, locks really would be in a separate record set too. Another challenge is making sure the user can understand what "normalized" means. I am not sure readers of the manual/cli help will be able to infer what it means from context. On the other hand, it is such a small use case that it seems imbalanced to provide a lot of background for the term "normal". What do you think? >> I wouldn't be opposed to splitting ChildProcess into ChildPID and >> ChildCommand. I would like it best if that change was made in addition >> to adding the normalized version, since the normalized version allows >> more functionality. > > I would think it=E2=80=99s OK to break compatibility on just these > =E2=80=9CChildProcess=E2=80=9D fields. Ok. Would it be ok if I put that in a separate commit? Thanks again! - John