On Sat, Jun 19 2021, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le Fri, 18 Jun 2021 21:00:51 +0200, > Xinglu Chen a écrit : > >> This series adds ‘ocaml-mparser’, a monad parser combinator library, >> plus two extensions for it --- ‘ocaml-mparser-re’ and >> ‘ocaml-mparser-pcre’. >> >> I noticed that there already exists an ‘ocaml4.07-pcre’ package, what >> is the policy regarding ‘ocaml4.07-*’ and ‘ocaml-*’ packages? >> >> Xinglu Chen (4): >> gnu: Add ocaml-mparser. >> gnu: Add ocaml-mparser-re. >> gnu: Add ocaml-mparser-pcre. >> gnu: Add ocaml-pcre. >> >> gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 88 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 88 >> insertions(+) >> >> >> base-commit: caf4a7a2770ef4d05a6e18f40d602e51da749ddc > > Hi Xinglu, > > thank you for the patches! First, you should reorder your patches: we > try to make sure every revision of guix is correct, but after the third > patch, ocaml-pcre is missing. I would simply put pcre first :). Yeah, I think I messed something up when sending them. > To answer your question, we try to avoid having both the ocaml and > ocaml4.07 around if possible. It seems that ocaml4.07-pcre is only > required for ocaml4.07-expect. Could you check if it is possible to > build expect with our latest ocaml package? > > If so, please have a patch that builds pcre and expect with the latest > ocaml, then another patch for updating pcre to the latest version, then > your three patches to add mparser. > > If not, then we have to keep ocaml4.07-pcre around, so here is how we > do it, in a single patch: > > Replace ocaml4.07-pcre with ocaml-pcre (remove the arguments that use > ocaml-4.07) and create a new ocaml4.07-pcre that inherits from it. It > would look like this: > > (define-public ocaml-pcre > (package > (name "ocaml-pcre") > ... > (properties `((ocaml4.07-variant ,(delay ocaml4.07-pcre)))) > ...)) > > (define-public ocaml4.07-pcre > (package-with-ocaml4.07 > (package > (inherit ocaml-pcre) > ... > (properties '())))) > > If the latest version of pcre cannot be built with ocaml 4.07, you can > specify a different source, like we do for ocaml4.07-parsexp for > instance. Thanks for the detailed answer! I think it would be great to have something like this in the manual :) > I'm looking forward to v2 of this series :) Should be coming soon :)