Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:

> Hi,
>
> On ven., 19 mai 2023 at 13:30, Michael Ford <fanquake@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> -(define-public bitcoin-core-23.1
>> +(define-public bitcoin-core-24.1
>
> [...]
>
>> -    (version "23.1")
>> +    (version "24.1")
>
> [...]
>
>> -                "03k56vgk0a0wr84gpj256hvijk6iyshl85hcrx800hiznyzl5hkl"))))
>> +                "0kmgpzknbykgwb8vd7hj3j1xxn35785gf4vii5705k6rnarks2la"))))
>
> [...]
>
>> -(define-public bitcoin-core bitcoin-core-23.1)
>> +(define-public bitcoin-core bitcoin-core-24.1)
>
> Out of curiosity, why are these two symbols required?  Maybe, it could
> be nice to drop ’bitcoin-core-xy.z’ and keep only ’bitcoin-core’, no?
>
> WDYT?
>
> Cheers,
> simon

Hi.
IIRC, at some point in the past we had two versions of bitcoin-core, and
the 'bitcoin-core' variable was pointing at one of the packages. Then
one of the versions became outdated and was removed.
Since we now have only one version, removing the leftovers from the
multiple package version support stuff seems like a good idea...