From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2G9ZNnJlcWeUEAAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 15:06:27 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2G9ZNnJlcWeUEAAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 16:06:26 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=sFdKtVP1; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=qkzHSBV1; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1735484786; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=/t/8lPPYM0L8PGI9Oq0yDGHr/VboFKD6yxm505dh7HQ=; b=P8sPvo9GnW+LTW/HoqVupCOMnmLEwqfAPPWntmYb4DED+7Ugps+/1+h03l92pYmejbl3q2 rC+nTJZruvQJoRrXSY92RAhbdUK8Jpg7Fc1LTcu3DimcOmdIbeR3SOrZ517ebNhiUTX4e1 HSmROony7/UFAA/QcEb093pVkVr4k/6dOxpbAZclD1LZ0Qc5Oan2G9ZcHm/LATymte3prg UbLW1LP6JcqGLjoUg0G/JbAICsjsZ9Gr/IpYolILGnQIu6Dfmz6+3OqOIawWTU2q0sCXS0 Tlmddqj01KKdqmRSeHmPO8S9DF+gS9vL8m6vPBQtiGZ/jy29833eaAsL50cgmA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=sFdKtVP1; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=qkzHSBV1; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1735484786; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=NG91bbhn9zHRlEPM+cSYYWNqDJRgocsP6UB+ziRbhtY/evWeCb+UrFPQC3kjCqOvQPXntX q7lq37NHY6YxlEk/it/D/eZ92V2xrMtsYIdApeiFYLxZwu+80fqYn2WQsucq9KndomTPGs RAtgJw2Id8039uXZP0T9tb/nKVv3MjkmbnwFQmr76nFSmkC6dIZzOrzByMunuO199rMz/W CYHZWPP+frxNace3rOUqYEmqyNwbGML+bmNvgd2CP9lIx3lWyhEt+XdCbtqrQWzgi+SEH+ LntJeEgDTjHkL5sg8QJbXqrYSJqYlgvh2Sqbfea7UzefFoWWEOHO0bymOizymw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ED0D9E97F for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 16:06:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRus0-0006qR-HJ; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 10:06:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRuro-0006lP-Kl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 10:06:11 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRuri-0006NQ-Hy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 10:06:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=/t/8lPPYM0L8PGI9Oq0yDGHr/VboFKD6yxm505dh7HQ=; b=sFdKtVP1NBvPFvV5ECZInIpaBDLEMjMnKbU+m6YHyZBgpawUxQZ/iy47Qf431j4WlmN30IbYrcZD8HEJQpDS5TtvJVv5wQ7Q0706Q1ZwgTIuS9XO42D8iXmEWmV5qOFHryI2ty54yaVUwY/0EdUGfLVY7Ml2Ci6XGWYL5lxVt2X4fhsTTZSOaZ7NSVCnrgM13eSUwvuR5fBremsWgO2j2mqAiwGn9SXK5VDUohFEpCQz6pSkyQ9VFkfrYkjvVUnxpa9G0Oqh4mu1pftMOSg05JmPuqnE5ECXk5Aq4yKRhMxdsgmrkvUcwRRFDX+sh3KPoBu1FDsUK/Xid2JeHwwmmw==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tRuri-0004m0-3w for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 10:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#74676] [core-packages-team 5/5] DRAFT gnu: gcc: Update gcc, gcc-toolchain to 14. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 15:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74676 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen Cc: 74676@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Enge , Efraim Flashner , Ekaitz Zarraga Received: via spool by 74676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74676.173548474918329 (code B ref 74676); Sun, 29 Dec 2024 15:06:02 +0000 Received: (at 74676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2024 15:05:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55831 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tRurU-0004lZ-Mb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 10:05:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48444) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tRurS-0004lJ-7z for 74676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 10:05:47 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRurK-0005vv-Nq; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 10:05:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=/t/8lPPYM0L8PGI9Oq0yDGHr/VboFKD6yxm505dh7HQ=; b=qkzHSBV12oy4r83FuplM VxZNp2vIoYOeuDq5/bTSGaPacAz6fSKnE5uzRoJUtVg1aT1N26P9xs8cn76TuAtsQxHAIVJPmwCCr wRpcEY9OCz6djFI+J+Hly9Jak18DC8kihsSQek3zpeKbH5V2Y9u8Qw5ZuCr6q5v+ttLis9quKM0Qc x2Bm08319TML6J3u1gqMXNrhktPsTtvx+RR2dtpmXyj13MrLkoSYSLJ5vqSJ33gDxHCVzTB/ktDHn J4StU1Av54VTLzy15xfNmuBi5kxg/Oxmn8RxuDsnCvsJ4kSuWaoDjc2bXxIJSlZwSG0abe0EV1vDY ydWQl/S/w4+zZg==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <87ed2ofpbo.fsf@gnu.org> (Janneke Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Tue, 03 Dec 2024 22:07:23 +0100") References: <87ed2ofpbo.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 16:05:34 +0100 Message-ID: <8734i6r0ld.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.40 X-Spam-Score: -7.40 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5ED0D9E97F X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: +07wkSz9LR2e Hello, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > Before pointing the build farm to core-packages-team and starting the > "real work" we may want to think about how to go forward. On the one > hand, having CFLAGS patches littered all over the place is not great, on > the other hand, if we were to add compatibility flags to a wrapper for > gcc, or into build systems, we may never get rid of such a "feature". > Thoughts? The -Wno-implicit-function-declaration CFLAGS/patches all around are not pretty, but they=E2=80=99ll vanish over time. A wrapper would be problematic for the reason you give notably. (In the early days of Guix, I tried really hard to avoid compiler wrappers, which is what Nixpkgs has, to remain as close as possible to the toolchain and to avoid =E2=80=9Cinvisible magic=E2=80=9D afforded by wrappe= rs.) Ludo=E2=80=99.