From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60500)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cwbZ5-0002L7-VV
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 17:37:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cwbZ1-00009H-0z
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 17:37:08 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38671)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1cwbZ0-000093-O8
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 17:37:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cwbZ0-0005bl-Hx
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 17:37:02 -0400
Subject: bug#26341: [PATCH] build: vm: Add missing module.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.26341.B26341.149160100321532@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20170402150157.7149-1-m.othacehe@gmail.com>
	<8760iks5u4.fsf@gnu.org> <86bmsbrvsk.fsf@gmail.com>
	<86a87vrvpd.fsf@gmail.com> <87efx6lekl.fsf@gnu.org>
	<8660iif2k4.fsf@gmail.com> <8760ii0xe7.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 23:36:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: <8760ii0xe7.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 06 Apr 2017 10:10:24 +0200")
Message-ID: <871st3uch0.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
Cc: 26341@debbugs.gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis:

> Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>>> That introduces a slight difference: in one case #:update-mtab? is not
>>> honored.  That said, it=E2=80=99s probably OK to ignore it; maybe leave=
 an =E2=80=9CXXX=E2=80=9D
>>> comment above just in case.  ;-)
>>
>> Ok !
>>
>>> Can you send a =E2=80=98git format-patch=E2=80=99 thing?  (Otherwise I =
could write the
>>> commit log on your behalf.)
>>
>> Sure, I'll send new patches !
>>
>> I have a follow-up question. Would it be ok to do the same thing for
>> other warnings on syscalls, 'reboot' for example ?
>
> Sure!  Likewise for =E2=80=98network-interface-flags=E2=80=99 and
> =E2=80=98set-network-interface-flags=E2=80=99, which guile-linux-syscalls=
.patch defines
> in exactly the same way as (guix build syscalls).

I=E2=80=99ve applied the first patches in the meantime.

I noticed that we get this at boot time (from the initrd):

  WARNING: (gnu build file-systems): imported module (guix build syscalls) =
overrides core binding `mount'

To get rid of it, (guix build syscalls) should in fact #:re-export those
bindings (or #:replace).  Annoying.

Ludo=E2=80=99.