From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da262-0003ol-FI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:50:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da25y-0007eE-H3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:50:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da25y-0007e1-Cb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:50:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1da25y-0001Oq-2t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:50:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27683] [PATCH] gnu: libjaylink: Update to 699b700. openocd: Update to 0.10.0 Resent-Message-ID: References: <20170713095923.4115-1-theodoros.for@openmailbox.org> <20170723001221.GB24840@jasmine.lan> From: Theodoros Foradis Message-ID: <871sp4a56d.fsf@openmailbox.org> In-reply-to: <20170723001221.GB24840@jasmine.lan> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:48:56 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 27683@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Leo, > Overall the changes look good to me, but can you clarify if they need to > be applied in the same commit like this? I remember reading somewhere (irc or mailing list probably), that a package should not break between commits (to be able to bisect). That would be the case with openocd, if libjaylink is updated before openocd. If this concern is not valid, I can split the commit in two and resubmit the patches. Regards, -- Theodoros Foradis