From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e70Ac-0002B5-UB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:27:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e70AY-0002N2-UP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:27:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e70AY-0002Mq-Qx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e70AY-0007gd-HA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:27:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#26685] certbot service experience Resent-Message-ID: References: <87tw56dhlp.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87eft3a804.fsf@gnu.org> <87tw0z4u5k.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8wymivl.fsf@dustycloud.org> From: Christopher Allan Webber In-reply-to: <87h8wymivl.fsf@dustycloud.org> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:26:13 -0500 Message-ID: <871slsmxkq.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: wingo@igalia.com, 26685@debbugs.gnu.org, clement@lassieur.org Christopher Allan Webber writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hi there! >> >> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: >> >>> Ludovic Courtès wrote on 26/07/17 at 10:59: >>>> Hello Andy, Chris, and Clément! :-) >>> >>> ...and Ludo', >>> >>>> Could we decide on what really needs to be done before we push this >>>> patch, and what can be done later? It’s a pity that this patch has been >>>> sitting there for so long despite being very useful! >>> >>> Zut alors. I missed that service! Nice. Necessary. >>> >>>> https://bugs.gnu.org/26685 >>> >>> If nobody objects, I'd like a few days to play with this before it gets >>> merged. It's a fine service, but I think it privileges the ‘--webroot’ >>> plugin too much (‘-w’ is a plugin-specific option, not global). I'd >>> rather not have my mail box spin up nginx... >> >> Any update on this? :-) >> >> Ludo’. > > My feeling is that it's a good idea to allow for non-webroot > configuration, but I think it shouldn't hold us back from moving forward > with getting the certbot service in. I especially feel this way this morning, when I had to push a server upgrade out and I suddenly realized I'm about to have to rebase this branch! Ludo’, are you okay with me working on getting this into master with just the webroot plugin for now and marking that the service configuration interface for this is semi-unstable for now in the manual? That way we can get this in and get other people to test it, and not let it languish. I think the service needs some serious work but we're likely to have more success getting around the rough edges by having more people using it anyway. WDYT?