From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejK3S-0007Iw-Jd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 02:22:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejK3O-0007jn-KP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 02:22:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejK3O-0007jg-Gl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 02:22:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ejK3O-00050Y-CD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 02:22:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30328] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-browse-at-remote-gnu. Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <20180202214457.14147-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <87k1vq5ec3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 19:47:13 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87k1vq5ec3.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 06 Feb 2018 16:26:36 +0100") Message-ID: <871shynjzi.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 30328@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Ludovic, Thank you for review! ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: =20 > What about simply adding the patch to =E2=80=98emacs-browse-at-remote= =E2=80=99 if > it=E2=80=99s committed upstream way? I'm sorry, what do you mean by =E2=80=9Ccommitted upstream way=E2=80=9D? I kinda agree to move the patch to =E2=80=98emacs-browse-at-remote=E2=80=99= , but if somebody want to upgrade it, maybe he will need to recreate a patch. WDYT? > Also please make the .patch file name a bit shorter; see =E2=80=98guix = lint=E2=80=99. Ouch, I missed this because of =E2=80=9CGUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=E2=80=9D. Usuall= y I unset this when prepare a package for Guix collection, but forget this time. =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env env guix lint emacs-browse-at-remote-gnu $ ./pre-inst-env env GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=3D guix lint emacs-browse-at-remote-= gnu /home/natsu/src/guix-wip-emacs-browse-at-remote-gnu/gnu/packages/emacs.scm:= 6474:2: emacs-browse-at-remote-gnu@0.9.0-1.31dcf77: emacs-browse-at-remote-gnu-add-support-for-gnu-repositories.patch: file name is too long fetching CVE database for 2018...nu@0.9.0-1.31dcf77 [cve]... =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlp53BEACgkQckbhHGm3 lWlxmw/9HjSzvV3vpb5jwOwEqE9pMYO9PrF8cAD1/ysX2Qcz5P7NlaQfvtIfwpw+ vI32iv9jZMryl4TS4X63qqRG6zVaAe4wpp1qWHM+v+AAKOHA6n0yYZQPLpavL2va URWW/sS+biR4FwCD2dgDZqDa6OwjquBccXi4QBrr+ZQdVH0140DZPX45bOKxvQRP BX3/1x9qMJVw88Amv7h2tvtHPtFq/rKzrygkHuTz8urt72vSIUho+bJ8RoKXj7EJ oxSnylzgoY7C2Vtiuc/RR1kqPBIjVESDQe5bSiWlua1dna+8q9wtTRbzUBQNu48h mPGdF5eTiLDahqfxdbvSXshvyckPiBoZl1hzUlLRKlJtWC/iMRp8SupWj8aKDjM4 esbdjZU/gF27Kv3alrJ7kghesFttmQjqNr6D4Yl3jCasCqVflWP4ZX91ps9v24II dJVngtx7gGRELLaD9emQWWjPY3B3w6w0YUKMIoGt6QhJmonmk29Dgr3pr9JVVKXm Okl+iKWoXAv20aBb71ulBqHabSsyf9xCDLEN4kMwemXbqbYniMveCRLiEwRtCwUE rSwwPNPa7Xj/RzOrBpz6WLLsRxImuSPyDLTWyegtSv6KJLlObvqQ1+N+wmS4ZU9h 6DNqByuJy6u7KIqHRdWfkKdEBG9aLY09livMoVtYz3n2X9Ur81I= =xwpI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--